ARTICLE
30 October 2020

The Province Of Ontario, Yet Again, Proposes To Reduce Hearing Of Necessity Rights In Expropriations And Related Rights

AB
Aird & Berlis LLP

Contributor

Aird & Berlis is a leading Canadian law firm with offices in Toronto and Vancouver, serving clients across Canada and around the world. We provide strategic legal advice on business, regulatory, constitutional, administrative law and public policy matters. Our lawyers and intellectual property professionals represent domestic and international clients, including multinational corporations, startups, individuals, governments and Indigenous nations. Aird & Berlis advises clients in all principal areas of law, such as capital markets, corporate, financial services, real estate, Aboriginal law, projects & infrastructure, restructuring & insolvency, intellectual property, litigation, municipal, land use planning & development, tax, technology and workplace law. Aird & Berlis is recognized as one of Canada’s leading law firms by national and international guides to the legal profession, including Chambers & Partners, Best Lawyers, The Legal 500, Lexology Index and Lexpert.
For the third time in 2020, the Province of Ontario has proposed legislation to further remove hearing of necessity and other rights for landowners faced with an expropriation related to certain...
Canada Real Estate and Construction

For the third time in 2020, the Province of Ontario has proposed legislation to further remove hearing of necessity and other rights for landowners faced with an expropriation related to certain transit projects.

A hearing of necessity, which is an inquiry into whether lands are necessary for the purpose for which they are to be expropriated, is one of the few opportunities for a landowner to challenge an expropriation commenced under the Expropriations Act.

Previously, and as highlighted in our update on Bill 171 earlier this year, the province eliminated and modified the rights of a landowner faced with an expropriation for a select group of enumerated transit priority projects. As identified in our subsequent publication, this change was expanded to apply to additional projects.

On October 22, 2020, the provincial legislature introduced Bill 222, the Ontario Rebuilding and Recovery Act, 2020. This proposed legislation further extends the scope of projects where the right of a hearing of necessity is eliminated and introduces related changes which have the effect of diminishing procedural rights afforded to landowners under the Expropriations Act.

Bill 222 proposes to amend the Building Transit Faster Act, 2020 to once again allow for a wider scope of projects where the proponent will be afforded stronger expropriation powers. The proposed change allows the province, by regulation, to increase the list of "prescribed transit projects" beyond the current closed list of: The Ontario Line, The Scarborough Subway Extension, The Yonge North Subway Extension and The Eglinton Crosstown West Extension.

Another notable expansion is that Schedule 3 of Bill 222 amends the definition of "transit oriented community projects" to include the to be prescribed projects under the Transit-Oriented Communities Act, 2020. This would allow for enhanced expropriation powers and more limited landowner rights for land-takings related to non-operational line infrastructure.

The foregoing projects are all located within the Greater Toronto Area. The proposed amendments in Bill 222 open up the possibility that the list of "prescribed transit projects" will include projects outside of the Greater Toronto Area.

The projects that will attract these new powers under Bill 222 have not yet been determined. However, the proponent of any prescribed transit project would have the expanded rights contained in the Building Transit Faster Act, 2020, including the elimination of a Hearing of Necessity, the ability to impose the requirement that a landowner obtain additional development permits, and the unilateral right to remove obstructions on adjacent properties without triggering rights to compensation under the Expropriations Act.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More