ARTICLE
24 July 2026

Former Workers File 401(k) TDF Suit Against American Express

HB
Hall Benefits Law

Contributor

Strategically designed, legally compliant benefit plans are the cornerstone of long-term business stability and growth. As such, HBL provides comprehensive legal guidance on benefits in M&A, ESOPs, executive compensation, health and welfare benefits, retirement plans, and ERISA litigation matters. Responsive, relationship-driven counsel is the calling card of the Firm.
Former American Express employees have filed a class action lawsuit alleging the company maintained underperforming investment funds in its $9 billion 401(k) plan, including proprietary target-date funds that served as default options. The plaintiffs claim these investment decisions breached fiduciary duties under ERISA and cost participants hundreds of millions in potential retirement savings, while potentially benefiting Amex's business relationship with Morgan Stanley Investment Management.
United States Employment and HR
Hall Benefits Law’s articles from Hall Benefits Law are most popular:
  • in Africa
Hall Benefits Law are most popular:
  • within Antitrust/Competition Law and Insurance topic(s)

Former employees at American Express (Amex) have filed suit alleging that the credit card company maintained underperforming funds in its 401(k) plan, including target-date funds (TDFs). In their Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) proposed class action, the workers claim that the investment mismanagement cost them hundreds of millions of dollars in future savings. The case is Rivetti et al. v. American Express Company et al., Case Number 1:26-cv-04082, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Matthew Rivetti, Natalie Feliz, and Shamroze Moosa filed their complaint on behalf of a proposed class of all participants in the Amex employee 401(k) plan, which holds about $9 billion in assets for 40,000 plan participants. In their complaint, the plaintiffs name Amex, its retirement savings plan investment committee, and Tammy Yee, Amex’s vice president of global well-being and benefits, as defendants. 

According to Rivetti and the other named plaintiffs, Amex offered various TDF and other investment funds in its 401(k) plan that underperformed in comparison to cheaper alternatives. The plan included a proprietary Amex TDF Services as its default investment option, which also underperformed its benchmarks and comparable available investments. As a result, the plaintiffs claim that Amex’s actions breached the fiduciary duties of prudence and loyalty under ERISA and caused them to lose millions in retirement savings. The plaintiffs further alleged that Amex had a material conflict of interest in offering certain funds in its 401(k) plan, since their participation benefited Amex’s business partner, Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc. 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More