- within Transport topic(s)
- in United States
- with readers working within the Healthcare industries
- within Transport, Employment and HR and Corporate/Commercial Law topic(s)
Perverse incentives across departments are pushing trucking companies toward higher risk — and bigger liability exposure.
Each department operates with conflicting goals that prioritize revenue over risk management, creating systematic safety vulnerabilities.
The Problem, by Department
Sales teams chase loads regardless of destination risk — disregarding high-verdict jurisdictions and locations insurers won't cover.
Recruiting fills seats with questionable drivers — overlooking accident histories and violations to meet capacity demands.
Operations prioritizes delivery over safety — pushing drivers through dangerous roads, adverse weather, and risky hours without considering the impacts of detention time.
Maintenance keeps trucks rolling with broken safety equipment — allowing vehicles to operate even when cameras and telematics systems aren't operating.
The Solution: De-risk Every Function
Sales must implement risk-based pricing and exclude high-verdict corridors where insurance coverage is unavailable or prohibitively expensive.
Recruiting needs defensible driver standards — accepting only candidates with good records or documented training to remediate deficiencies.
Operations should leverage data to avoid high-risk roads, dangerous driving times, and severe weather — not just driver convenience.
Maintenance must ensure all safety systems are functional before dispatch — even if the truck can technically operate without them.
The Bottom Line
Misaligned incentives create liability time bombs. Trucking companies that fail to restructure departmental goals around risk management will pay the price in catastrophic verdicts.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
