ARTICLE
3 May 2026

Already Have Life Insurance? Why An ILIT May Be Worth It

FF
Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Contributor

Farrell Fritz is a full-service regional law firm with approximately 80 attorneys in five offices, dedicated to serving closely-held/privately-owned/family owned businesses, high net worth individuals and families, and nonprofit organizations. Farrell Fritz handles legal matters in the areas of bankruptcy and restructuring; business divorce; commercial litigation; construction; corporate and finance; emerging companies and venture capital; employment law; environmental law; estate litigation; healthcare; land use and zoning; New York State Regulatory and Government Relations; not-for-profit law; real estate; tax planning and controversy; tax certiorari, and trusts and estates.

With a federal estate tax rate of 40%, estate planning conversations often start and stop with the relatively high federal exemption (currently $15 million for individuals and $30 million for married couples).
United States New York Insurance
Evan D. Feder’s articles from Farrell Fritz, P.C. are most popular:
  • with readers working within the Insurance industries
Farrell Fritz, P.C. are most popular:
  • within Intellectual Property and Privacy topic(s)

With a federal estate tax rate of 40%, estate planning conversations often start and stop with the relatively high federal exemption (currently $15 million for individuals and $30 million for married couples). That can make estate tax exposure feel remote. In practice, however, many taxpayers may face a different reality at the state level.

For example, states such as New York impose their own estate tax, with a significantly lower exemption (currently $7.35 million). New York’s so-called estate tax “cliff” can create an unexpected result: if a taxable estate exceeds the exemption by more than 5%, the entire estate—not just the excess—may be subject to estate tax. When factoring in a residence, retirement accounts, investment portfolios, and other assets, some estates can approach or exceed that threshold more quickly than anticipated.

Life insurance can further complicate this analysis. Under Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) section 2042, death benefits from a policy insuring the decedent’s life are generally includible in the decedent’s gross estate if the decedent was the owner of the policy or if the proceeds are payable to the decedent’s estate. This inclusion applies even if the proceeds are payable to a third-party beneficiary. As a result, life insurance intended to provide liquidity or support beneficiaries can inadvertently increase estate tax exposure.

One planning technique to address this issue is the use of an irrevocable life insurance trust (ILIT). Properly structured, an ILIT owns the policy and removes any “incidents of ownership” from the insured. This generally means the insured cannot retain powers such as changing beneficiaries, surrendering the policy, or borrowing against it. If implemented correctly, the policy proceeds may be excluded from the insured’s taxable estate.

Timing, however, is critical. Under IRC section 2035, if an existing policy is transferred to an ILIT and the insured dies within three years of the transfer, the proceeds may be pulled back into the estate. To mitigate this risk, practitioners often recommend that the ILIT purchase new policies directly, using contributions from the insured.

While ILITs are not appropriate in every case, they remain a commonly used tool for managing estate tax exposure, particularly where life insurance plays a significant role in an overall estate plan.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More