ARTICLE
29 April 2026

BCLP Files Amicus Brief In Support Of Anthropic's First Amendment Rights

BC
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner

Contributor

We build lasting relationships that deliver impact. Clients trust us because we invest in real partnerships and work faster and smarter to provide quality advice that supports success. We understand where they need to go and how they can get there.

Connecting the dots between client goals, market dynamics and the law is what we do best. Our one-firm structure, international reach and culture of collaboration ensures clients can access integrated, specialist advice wherever they need it.

A law firm team filed an amicus brief supporting Anthropic's First Amendment challenge against federal government designations that branded the AI company a supply chain risk and ordered cessation of all federal and contractor use of its technology. The brief argues these actions violate constitutional protections, threaten market competition, and harm American taxpayers by denying a U.S. AI company the scale needed to compete globally.
United States Government, Public Sector
David B. Schwartz’s articles from Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner are most popular:
  • with readers working within the Technology and Law Firm industries

Amicus Brief for Taxpayers Protection Alliance Foundation (TPAF) supports Anthropic’s challenge to administration's supply chain risk designation.

Partner David B. Schwartz, Appellate Practice Group Co-Leader Barbara Smith-Tyson, and Associate Jessica Limbaugh drafted and filed an amicus brief on behalf of the Taxpayers Protection Alliance Foundation (TPAF) in support of protecting Anthropic’s core First Amendment-protected expression.

In its amicus brief, TPAF argues that the D.C. Circuit should grant Anthropic’s petition for review because the government’s actions violate the First Amendment, threaten the free market, ignore the plain meaning of the relevant statute, and lack an intelligible principle, all of which will harm American taxpayers. In particular, the TPAF amicus brief points out that the government’s actions deny Anthropic the necessary scale to grow and compete with other global competitors, despite the import of AI to the U.S. economy and U.S. taxpayers.

In February 2026, President Trump, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, and the Department of War branded Anthropic a “supply chain risk” under two different statutes after Anthropic and the government could not agree to limitations on the use of Anthropic’s AI products in military disputes. Rather than cancel the Department of War’s contract with Anthropic, Anthropic alleges that the government retaliated against the company, with President Trump directing all federal agencies to immediately cease use of Anthropic’s technology and Secretary Hegseth ordering all U.S. contractors to stop any commercial activity with Anthropic.

Anthropic challenged the government’s supply chain risk designations in two separate court cases - one in a district court in California and one in the D.C. Circuit. In California, the district court preliminarily enjoined the first statutory designation of Anthropic as a supply chain risk, which the government has appealed and is ongoing in the Ninth Circuit. On April 22, in the D.C. Circuit, Anthropic filed its petition challenging the second statutory designation of Anthropic as a supply chain risk, which TPAF supported in its amicus brief.

Read more about the amicus brief from the The Hill newsletter here, and the amicus brief itself here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More