ARTICLE
21 May 2026

SEC Rescinds “No-Deny” Settlement Policy

JW
Jones Walker

Contributor

At Jones Walker, we look beyond today’s challenges and focus on the opportunities of the future. Since our founding in May 1937 by Joseph Merrick Jones, Sr., and Tulane Law School graduates William B. Dreux and A.J. Waechter, we have consistently asked ourselves a simple question: What can we do to help our clients succeed, today and tomorrow?
The Securities and Exchange Commission has eliminated a decades-old settlement requirement that prevented defendants from publicly denying allegations. This policy shift, affecting enforcement actions dating back to 1972, fundamentally changes how parties can communicate about settled cases and may reshape settlement negotiations going forward.
United States Government, Public Sector
Emily Gauthier’s articles from Jones Walker are most popular:
  • within Government and Public Sector topic(s)
  • in China

On May 18, 2026, the SEC rescinded its long-standing policy that generally conditioned settlement of enforcement actions on a defendant or respondent’s agreement not to publicly deny the SEC’s allegations. The policy, codified in Rule 202.5(e) of the SEC's rules of informal procedure, had been in place since 1972, although most other federal agencies, including the DOJ, have not adopted comparable no-deny policies.

The practical effect is straightforward. The SEC may now settle enforcement actions without requiring a settling party to refrain from publicly denying the SEC's allegations or suggesting the allegations lack a factual basis. The SEC also stated that it will not enforce existing no-deny provisions in prior settlements or seek to reopen settled cases based on a breach of those provisions.

The change may provide flexibility in settlement negotiations and post-settlement communications. However, the SEC emphasized that the rescission does not affect its discretion to seek admissions in appropriate cases, including cases involving parallel criminal proceedings. Nor does it change the underlying settlement terms, sanctions, injunctions, undertakings, bars, or other remedies that may be imposed in an enforcement resolution.

Bottom line: The SEC has removed a settlement condition that has been criticized in recent years as unusually restrictive, potentially making settlement more attractive in some cases.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More