United States: Corporate and Company Law

Subscribe
Business law and corporate law thought leadership, articles, podcasts, videos and webinars from expert sources across the legal world. Explore insights covering topics that involve business and corporate law produced by specialists working in this area every day.
Article
SEC Issues Innovation Exemption For Tokenized Securities Venues: A New Framework For Onchain Trading Of Tokenized NMS Stocks
On September 17, 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) issued an order designed to facilitate onchain trading of tokenized National Market System (“NMS”) stocks through a new category of trading venue, a Tokenized Securities Venue (“TSV”).[1] The so-called “Innovation Exemption” permits TSVs that meet certain specified conditions to trade tokenized NMS stock using permissioned automated market makers and liquidity pools[2] (together, “AMM Liquidity Pools”) and grants a five-year, conditional exemption to TSVs from the definition of “exchange” under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). The Innovation Exemption also grants a five-year, conditional exemption from the definition of “dealer” under the Exchange Act to liquidity providers in an AMM Liquidity Pool used by a TSV.
United States Commercial
ST
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett
Article
Can AI Make Real-Money Gaming More Engaging, Secure, And Fair?
Enterprise AI creates legal risk throughout the AI lifecycle, beginning before deployment. Model selection, data pipelines, vendor relationships, AI-generated outputs, consequential decision-making, contracts, and governance can create intellectual-property, privacy, confidentiality, contractual, regulatory, and liability exposure. Artificial intelligence is rapidly reshaping real-money gaming, but its value proposition is inseparable from regulatory risk.
United States Media & IT
G
Gamma Law
Curated
CBP Can Now Void Importer Of Record Numbers For Inaccurate Form 5106 Data
On September 18, 2026, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) began enhanced enforcement of importer of record (IOR) identity data on CBP Form 5106. CBP announced the enforcement program in a general notice published in the Federal Register. Accuracy of Importer of Record Data Submitted to CBP, 91 Fed. Reg. 53,627, 53,627 (Aug. 19, 2026). This notice states CBP’s enforcement position; it is not a new regulation and does not add new Form 5106 data elements. The enforcement includes immediate voiding of IOR numbers when CBP determines the data is inaccurate or incomplete. A voided number is “invalid for any purpose,” including entering merchandise.
United States International
BG
Braumiller Law Group, PLLC
Article
Revenue vs. EBITDA: Choosing The Right Earnout Metric
When structuring an earnout in a middle-market M&A transaction, the choice between gross revenue and EBITDA as the underlying metric can determine whether the deal creates value or triggers post-closing disputes. Each metric measures fundamentally different aspects of financial performance and carries distinct legal and operational risks that both buyers and sellers must carefully navigate.
United States Commercial
BB
Beresford Booth
Article
Texas Business Court Clarifies Jurisdictional Limits: Existing Receiverships Remain Under Appointing Court’s Exclusive Control
The Texas Business Court addressed whether parties could circumvent an existing district court receivership by filing a new action in the Business Court. In Parker v. Lynzara-Austin Real Estate Management, LLC, Judge Stacy Rogers Sharp examined the jurisdictional boundaries between the Business Court and district courts when a receivership is already in place, clarifying the scope of exclusive jurisdiction under Texas law.
United States Litigation
GT
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Curated
CBP Can Now Void Importer Of Record Numbers For Inaccurate Form 5106 Data
On September 18, 2026, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) began enhanced enforcement of importer of record (IOR) identity data on CBP Form 5106. CBP announced the enforcement program in a general notice published in the Federal Register. Accuracy of Importer of Record Data Submitted to CBP, 91 Fed. Reg. 53,627, 53,627 (Aug. 19, 2026). This notice states CBP’s enforcement position; it is not a new regulation and does not add new Form 5106 data elements. The enforcement includes immediate voiding of IOR numbers when CBP determines the data is inaccurate or incomplete. A voided number is “invalid for any purpose,” including entering merchandise.
United States International
BG
Braumiller Law Group, PLLC
Curated
CBP Can Now Void Importer Of Record Numbers For Inaccurate Form 5106 Data
On September 18, 2026, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) began enhanced enforcement of importer of record (IOR) identity data on CBP Form 5106. CBP announced the enforcement program in a general notice published in the Federal Register. Accuracy of Importer of Record Data Submitted to CBP, 91 Fed. Reg. 53,627, 53,627 (Aug. 19, 2026). This notice states CBP’s enforcement position; it is not a new regulation and does not add new Form 5106 data elements. The enforcement includes immediate voiding of IOR numbers when CBP determines the data is inaccurate or incomplete. A voided number is “invalid for any purpose,” including entering merchandise.
United States International
BG
Braumiller Law Group, PLLC
Article
SEC Insider Trading Investigations: How The SEC Evaluates Cases And How To Build A Winning Defense Strategy
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) relies heavily on circumstantial evidence when building an insider trading case. Defending against an SEC insider trading investigation requires analyzing the exact evidentiary factors the SEC uses to establish liability, identifying weaknesses in the Division of Enforcement’s calculus, and establishing an alternative, credible explanation for the trades before formal charges are filed.
United States Commercial
Law Firm of David R. Chase, Esq.
Article
Insider Trading Investigations: What Happens When The SEC Or FBI Contacts You?
There are few legal situations that create more stress and uncertainty for investors, corporate insiders, pharma employees, investment bankers, or securities professionals than learning that securities regulators are investigating you for insider trading. Federal regulators, including the SEC and DOJ, aggressively pursue insider trading cases, and that historical trend appears to be continuing without pause.
United States Commercial
Law Firm of David R. Chase, Esq.
See more