ARTICLE
8 April 2026

Employee Relations Law Journal | Hands On Or Hands Off: A Plan Sponsor's Guide To Picking A Section 3(21) Investment Advisor Or Section 3(38) Investment Manager

DL
Davis+Gilbert LLP

Contributor

Davis+Gilbert LLP is a strategically focused, full-service mid-sized law firm of more than 130 lawyers. Founded over a century ago and located in New York City, the firm represents a wide array of clients – ranging from start-ups to some of the world's largest public companies and financial institutions.
Under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), fiduciary responsibility lies at the heart of retirement-plan governance. The statute imposes on plan sponsors the duties of loyalty...
United States Employment and HR

Under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), fiduciary responsibility lies at the heart of retirement-plan governance. The statute imposes on plan sponsors the duties of loyalty, prudence, and diversification under Section 404(a), among others. A recurring question for plan sponsors is whether to engage an investment advisor who acts under ERISA Section 3(21) or to delegate full discretionary authority to an investment manager under Section 3(38).

This column explains the differences between these two fiduciary roles, outlines the advantages and disadvantages of each, and provides guidance for plan sponsors regardless of which path they choose.

Continue reading this article Download

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More