WilmerHale provides legal representation across a comprehensive range of practice areas critical to the success of its clients. With a staunch commitment to public service, the firm is a leader in pro bono representation. WilmerHale is 1,000 lawyers strong with 12 offices in the United States, Europe and Asia.
Recent court decisions demonstrate that AI-related securities litigation claims are being evaluated through established Private Securities Litigation Reform Act frameworks rather than novel legal theories. WilmerHale attorneys analyze two 2026 cases showing how courts require plaintiffs to identify specific, verifiable AI statements and plead contemporaneous contradictory facts to survive dismissal motions.
Early 2026 decisions confirm a consistent through line. AI washing claims do not mark a doctrinal shift but instead reflect the standard application of settled PSLRA principles to new technologies. AI may change the facts, but it does not change the law. Claims continue to proceed only where plaintiffs identify concrete, verifiable statements and plead particularized facts showing those statements were false or misleading when made. Absent that, the PSLRA's gatekeeping function remains firmly intact.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
