ARTICLE
18 November 2021

HHS OIG Studies State Medicaid Programs' Use Of Telehealth

SM
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

Contributor

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more than 1,200 lawyers located in 16 offices worldwide, our client-centered approach is grounded in nearly a century of building enduring relationships on trust and collaboration. Our broad and diversified practices serve global clients—from startups to Fortune 500 companies—at every stage of the business cycle, including high-stakes litigation, complex transactions, sophisticated financings and regulatory issues. With leading edge technologies and innovation behind our team, we pride ourselves on being a strategic partner to our clients.
The United States Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General ("OIG") recently issued a report concerning the use of telehealth to render behavioral health services...
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • within Cannabis & Hemp and Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring topic(s)

The United States Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General ("OIG") recently issued a report concerning the use of telehealth to render behavioral health services to Medicaid enrollees, calling for greater evaluation and oversight in the hopes of encouraging states to implement changes to improve how their Medicaid programs use telehealth for behavioral health services, including mental health assessments, individual therapy, and medication management.

The report stems from a survey of Medicaid directors from 37 states and relevant stakeholder interviews, providing insight into states' telehealth oversight efforts as of January and February 2020, before the expansion of telehealth due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The report highlights the urgent need for increased telehealth oversight because most states apparently had not adequately evaluated the impacts of telehealth in their state. By way of example, three states were unable to distinguish between services provided via telehealth versus in-person, and only a few states had conducted meaningful evaluations of telehealth in their state. Nevertheless, with respect to states that performed some type of telehealth assessment, they generally found that telehealth increased access to care while reducing service costs.

The report also notes concerns related to the quality of care provided, and the high potential for fraud, waste, and abuse. Indeed, the OIG found that many states did not conduct monitoring or oversight specific to telehealth, with only 11 states conducting telehealth-specific monitoring and oversight. These concerns are especially important because the DOJ recently charged numerous medical professionals with allegedly participating in telehealth fraud schemes damaging the government by more than $1 billion.

The OIG goes on to recommend the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS"):

  1. Ensure that the three states unable to distinguish telehealth from in-person services implement indicators to differentiate those services;
  2. Conduct evaluations and support state efforts to evaluate the impacts of telehealth on access, cost, and quality of behavioral health services; and
  3. Monitor for fraud, waste, and abuse, and support state efforts to oversee telehealth for behavioral health services.

CMS responded to the report by concurring with the first recommendation, and noting that it has supported state telehealth efforts and is currently monitoring the impact of the COVID-19 public health emergency on behavioral health services delivered through telehealth.

This report highlights the fact that broader telehealth utilization likely will result in increased government scrutiny, as evidenced by recent government actions focused on the telehealth space. Providers should therefore implement best practices to address challenges associated with the provision of telehealth services in an effort to effectively withstand increasing government scrutiny in this space.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More