ARTICLE
9 April 2014

IRS Announces Guidance On Same Sex Marriage And Retirement Plans

SH
Stites & Harbison PLLC

Contributor

A full-service law firm representing clients across the United States and internationally, Stites & Harbison, PLLC is known as a preeminent firm managing sophisticated transactions, challenging litigation and complex regulatory matters on a daily basis.  The firm represents a broad spectrum of clients including multinational corporations, financial institutions, pharmaceutical companies, health care organizations, private companies, nonprofit organizations, and individuals. Stites & Harbison has 10 offices across five states.
The IRS issued guidance on applying the Supreme Court’s decision in "United States v. Windsor" concerning same sex marriage to qualified retirement plans.
United States Family and Matrimonial
Stites & Harbison PLLC are most popular:
  • within Employment and HR and Technology topic(s)
  • with Inhouse Counsel
  • in Canada
  • with readers working within the Law Firm industries

On April 4, 2014, the IRS issued long awaited guidance on the application of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Windsor on June 26, 2013, concerning same sex marriage to qualified retirement plans.  In Windsor, the Court found that section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (“DOMA”) was unconstitutional. Section 3 had provided that for all federal law purposes the word “marriage” means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife and the word spouse refers only to a person of the opposite sex.  Subsequent to the Windsor decision, the IRS issued guidance stating that for all federal tax purposes the term “spouse” includes an individual married to a person of the same sex if the individuals are lawfully married under state law.  In addition, the IRS recognized same sex marriages that are validly entered into in a state whose laws authorize the marriage of two individuals of the same sex even if the married couple is domiciled in a state that does not recognize the validity of same-sex marriages.

Qualified retirement plans (including section 403(b) plans) must reflect the outcome of Windsor in both its written terms and in operation as of June 26, 2013.  The definition of spouse impacts a qualified retirement plan in a number of ways, including, but not limited to, required minimum distributions, the joint and survivor annuity rules, and qualified domestic relations orders.  Whether a qualified retirement plan must be amended to reflect the outcome of Windsor and IRS guidance depends on the terms of the plan.  If the qualified plan’s terms are not inconsistent with Windsor and IRS guidance, then an amendment may not be necessary.  An amendment is necessary for a plan to apply the outcome of Windsor prior to June 26, 2013.

The IRS deadline to adopt plan amendments conforming the terms of the plan to Windsor is generally December 31, 2014.  A different deadline may apply for section 403(b) plans.  Legal counsel should be consulted to determine whether any given plan should be amended.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More