ARTICLE
14 October 2026

Business And Benefits Groups File 4th Circuit Amicus Brief Against 401(k) Forfeiture Suit

HB
Hall Benefits Law

Contributor

Strategically designed, legally compliant benefit plans are the cornerstone of long-term business stability and growth. As such, HBL provides comprehensive legal guidance on benefits in M&A, ESOPs, executive compensation, health and welfare benefits, retirement plans, and ERISA litigation matters. Responsive, relationship-driven counsel is the calling card of the Firm.
A coalition of business and benefits groups has filed an amicus brief with the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, urging the court to uphold the dismissal of a lawsuit challenging Northrop Grumman's use of forfeited 401(k) funds. The case centers on whether employers can legally use these forfeitures to offset their own plan contributions rather than reduce participant administrative fees, a practice the groups argue has long been sanctioned by federal regulations.
United States Employment and HR

A coalition of groups has asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit to affirm the dismissal of a 401(k) plan forfeiture lawsuit against Northrop Grumman Corp., an aerospace and defense company. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the ERISA Industry Committee (ERIC), and the American Benefits Council filed an amicus brief in the case, arguing that dismissal was warranted because federal regulations traditionally have allowed employers to use forfeited 401(k) funds to pay for their plan contributions. The case is Laura Garner v. Northrop Grumman Corporation, Case Number 26-1258, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

In their amicus brief, the groups claim that the U.S. government has sanctioned the practice the plaintiffs complained about in their suit as lawful. More specifically, the U.S. Department of the Treasury has issued regulations and guidance making it clear that the forfeiture allocation practice was permissible under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). Furthermore, the groups pointed to federal tax code regulations allowing employers to use forfeited funds in precisely the manner Northrop Grumman did, even before ERISA was enacted.

The groups flatly stated that if the court allowed this suit to proceed, it would not only disregard the fact that many other courts have dismissed similar cases, but also contravene the Treasury Department’s authorization of the practice. Finally, the groups argued that ERISA does not require fiduciaries to ensure that plan participants and beneficiaries receive more in plan benefits than they are contractually obligated to provide.

Northrop Grumman workers filed their lawsuit in March 2025, claiming that the employer violated its fiduciary duties under ERISA. The workers claim that the employer wrongfully used forfeited 401(k) funds to pay its employer contributions, instead of using them to defray administrative costs borne by plan participants. As a result, workers argue that they would have earned more in retirement savings if they had paid lower plan management fees.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, as the largest business organization worldwide, regularly lobbies in favor of free enterprise policies. ERIC is a trade association for employers whose plans are subject to ERISA. The American Benefits Council also advocates for policies to support employer-sponsored benefit plans.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More