United States: Employee Rights/ Labour Relations

Subscribe
Employment law and labour law articles and thought leadership, podcasts, videos and webinars from expert sources across the legal world. Explore articles covering topics such as Discrimination, Employee Benefits and Compensation, Health and Safety, Unfair/Wrongful Dismissal, Whistleblowing, Employment Rights, Outsourcing and Redundancy.
Podcast
Point Two LE Nation: Workplace Privacy Podcast – Beyond Borders: A Practical Guide To Approaching Cutting Edge Global Workplace Privacy Issues
Workplace privacy laws vary dramatically across borders, creating complex compliance challenges for multinational employers. Two privacy specialists examine how organizations can navigate the stark differences between US consent-based frameworks and international data protection regimes when managing employee and candidate information across jurisdictions.
United States Employment
SS
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Article
Security-Clearance Decisions And Employment Claims In The Space And Defense Sectors: Where Courts Draw The Line
Many space and defense jobs require a federal security clearance. If the government denies, delays, or revokes a clearance, an employee may be unable to continue in that role; the employer may reassign or terminate the employee. If the cleared individual is an officer of the company, revocation could jeopardize the company’s eligibility to perform cleared work. A subsequent employment claim may allege discrimination or retaliation in the clearance process or in the employer’s response.
United States Employment
GT
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Article
NLRB Reinstates Employer-Friendly Framework To Analyze Employee Offensive Conduct
The National Labor Relations Board has reinstated the General Motors standard for analyzing when employee offensive conduct loses protection under the National Labor Relations Act, replacing the Biden-era Lion Elastomers decision. This shift returns to a burden-shifting framework that focuses on employer motive rather than context-specific tests, potentially making it easier for employers to discipline workers for inappropriate language or behavior.
United States Employment
RB
Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren s.c.
Article
Landmark DoorDash Settlement Confirms NYC DCWP’s Aggressive Enforcement Posture
New York City's Department of Consumer and Worker Protection secured a landmark $131.5 million settlement with DoorDash, marking the largest worker settlement in the city's history and the largest involving food delivery workers nationwide. The agreement provides over $115 million in direct compensation to more than 260,000 delivery workers who were underpaid, unpaid, or paid late, while establishing a comprehensive three-year compliance monitoring program.
United States Employment
MB
Mayer Brown
Article
Mayor Mamdani Issues Executive Order ‘Cracking Down On Worker Abuse’; Creates Mayor’s Office For Worker Power
New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani campaigned on policies designed to protect and increase benefits for low-income workers, and some of the Mayor’s core priorities relate to income inequality and affordability concerns for City residents. Recently, the Mayor has taken steps to empower employees and has sought to send a message to the business community that the City will endeavor to protect workers’ rights.
United States Employment
GT
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Article
Lion Elastomers III: The Return Of General Motors
The National Labor Relations Board has reinstated the General Motors standard for evaluating employee misconduct during protected activity, marking the third decision in the Lion Elastomers case series. This development simplifies how employers must assess discipline decisions by applying the traditional Wright Line framework rather than multiple setting-specific tests. The ruling emphasizes the importance of consistent workplace policies and uniform enforcement of conduct rules across all situations.
United States Employment
SS
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Article
California Signs Landmark New AI Workplace Laws On Termination, Layoffs And Surveillance
California has enacted sweeping new legislation regulating artificial intelligence in employment decisions, from prohibiting fully automated terminations to restricting AI-powered workplace surveillance. These laws establish unprecedented requirements for human oversight, employee notification, and transparency when employers deploy automated decision systems. What do these regulations mean for companies using AI tools to manage their workforce, and how should employers prepare for compliance?
United States Employment
SM
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Article
Understanding Risks Of Employees’ AI-Drafted Complaints
As artificial intelligence transforms workplace complaint drafting, investigators face a new challenge: distinguishing between polished AI-generated legal language and the underlying facts of misconduct allegations. How should companies adapt their internal investigation practices when employees increasingly rely on AI tools that can produce attorney-quality submissions but may introduce inaccuracies, unsupported conclusions, or obscure critical context about credibility and firsthand knowledge?
United States Employment
B
Bracewell
Article
DOL Pulls The Plug On Plan To Move FLSA Interpretations Out Of The CFR
The U.S. Department of Labor's Wage and Hour Division has withdrawn its controversial proposal to remove nine parts of longstanding Fair Labor Standards Act interpretive guidance from the Code of Federal Regulations. What does this reversal mean for employers who have relied on these decades-old interpretations, and how does the Supreme Court's Loper Bright decision reshape the legal weight of agency guidance going forward?
United States Employment
PR
Proskauer Rose LLP
Article
California Just Expanded Regulation Of Workplace AI Beyond CCPA ADMT
California has enacted three new laws governing employer use of artificial intelligence and automated tools in layoffs, workplace monitoring, discipline, and termination. These laws are separate from the California Consumer Privacy Act’s automated decisionmaking technology (ADMT) rules and apply more broadly to employers and public entities that are not covered by the CCPA. CCPA covered employers may need to integrate compliance with ADMT and Risk Assessment requirements (for sensitive personal information processing activities and automated decisionmaking technology).
United States Employment
SS
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
See more