ARTICLE
14 July 2026

Democrats Ask DOL To Ditch Proposed Independent Contractor Rule In Favor Of 2024 Standard

HB
Hall Benefits Law

Contributor

Strategically designed, legally compliant benefit plans are the cornerstone of long-term business stability and growth. As such, HBL provides comprehensive legal guidance on benefits in M&A, ESOPs, executive compensation, health and welfare benefits, retirement plans, and ERISA litigation matters. Responsive, relationship-driven counsel is the calling card of the Firm.
Democratic members of the House Labor Caucus have asked the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) to rescind its proposed independent contractor rule and return to the stronger 2024 standard established during the Biden...
United States Employment and HR
Hall Benefits Law’s articles from Hall Benefits Law are most popular:
  • with readers working within the Securities & Investment industries

Democratic members of the House Labor Caucus have asked the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) to rescind its proposed independent contractor rule and return to the stronger 2024 standard established during the Biden administration. The DOL’s currently proposed rule would rescind the 2024 rule on employee classification and return to a standard similar to the one the DOL used in 2021.

According to the DOL, the proposed approach is consistent with federal court precedent and makes it easier to distinguish between employees and independent contractors under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). However, Democrats characterize the proposed rule as a weakening of the current standard, which increases the risk of employee misclassification and the accompanying loss of wages and benefits.

The Financial Services Institute (FSI) and other members of its coalition sued the DOL over the 2024 rule, which took effect in March 2024. In April 2025, a federal court granted a motion to temporarily suspend implementation of the 2024 rule to allow DOL time to review and reconsider it.

Democratic lawmakers emphasized the importance of the “totality of circumstances” analysis in properly identifying the employer-employee relationship. They claim that the proposed rule is overly rigid in relying primarily on certain enumerated “core” factors and disregards economic reality factors. In contrast, a multifactor approach would ensure that all employees get the FLSA protections to which they are entitled.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More