China: Data Protection

On 23 June 2026, the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) and five other agencies jointly issued the Opinions on Vigorously Promoting the High-Quality Development of the Advertising Industry...

China's National Financial Regulatory Administration has issued comprehensive guidance on artificial intelligence development and application in the banking and insurance sectors, establishing systematic requirements for AI governance, risk management, data protection, and algorithmic transparency. Insurance institutions must now navigate new compliance obligations covering high-risk AI applications in underwriting, claims processing, and risk assessment, while balancing innovation with enhanced consumer pr

上海市知的財産局が市場監督管理局、人民検察院と共同で発布した新たな通知により、営業秘密の保護とデータ製品の知的財産権登録を融合さ

On April 3, 2026, China’s Cyberspace Administration (CAC) released draft Measures for the Management of Digital Virtual Human Information Services (《数字虚拟人信息服务管理办法（征求意见稿）》)...

Since ChatGPT's debut and the rise of DeepSeek for deep reasoning, generative AI tools has become essential for busi- ness operations. More and more companies are increasingly embracing AI, albeit cautiously, by permitting workplace use, purchasing enterprise AI subscriptions and creating corporate AI accounts for employees, with the aim of bringing employee AI usage under corporate risk management.

Within the spectrum of pharmaceutical intellectual property protections, four special mechanisms stand out: the Bolar exemption, patent linkage, patent term extension, and data exclusivity.

The Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) has issued the Provisions on the Management of Personal Information Collection and Use by Internet Applications (Draft for Comments).

摘要：2025年4月30日，爱尔兰数据保护委员会（"DPC"）正式作出针对TikTok Technology Limited（"TikTok"）的处罚决定，认定TikTok在中国境内远程访问欧洲经济区（"EEA")...

As artificial intelligence tools become increasingly integrated into legal practice, critical questions emerge about privilege protections and professional responsibilities. Recent court rulings and regulatory guidance are establishing new boundaries for how parties and their counsel may use AI platforms when handling confidential case information, with significant implications for litigation strategy and attorney conduct.