ARTICLE
18 January 2026

Employment Relations Podcast #46 – Safety In The Workplace: Drug And Alcohol Testing And Policies

PA
Piper Alderman

Contributor

A premier commercial law firm, Piper Alderman has offices in Adelaide, Brisbane, Melbourne and Sydney. We work with clients across Australia and internationally to achieve optimum legal and commercial solutions. Our legal expertise has been built on nearly two centuries of industry experience. Piper Alderman has been a leading advisor to Australian commercial interests for more than 170 years and we continue to advance in knowledge, skills and commitment. We listen to our clients, respond to their needs and guide them through increasingly complex regulatory and business landscapes.
Taking the time to get your safety framework right, including regular reviews to address changes, will be time well spent.
Australia Employment and HR
Emily Haar’s articles from Piper Alderman are most popular:
  • within Employment and HR topic(s)
  • with Senior Company Executives, HR and Inhouse Counsel
  • with readers working within the Healthcare, Metals & Mining and Retail & Leisure industries

January is a time where organisations often review their policies and procedures for best practice compliance. One policy that might need a review, following recent case law developments, is your organisation's drug and alcohol policy.

In this episode of Employment Law for the Time Poor, Emily Haar, Partner, and Maida Mujkic, Associate, consider the implications for organisations arising from a string of 2024 and 2025 decisions in the Fair Work Commission.

In these cases, the issue of whether a dismissal following a positive substance test was "unfair" turned on how testing policies were worded, whether the organisation tested for "impairment" or a mere positive result, and how the relevant policy was communicated to staff. Having a very clear policy that sets out the rules is important, but if no one in the organisation understands what is expected of them, or how the employer will deal with a positive result, the organisation is placed at significant risk.

The situation becomes even more complicated because prescription medications, including medicinal cannabis, can also create potential safety risks in the workplace. Taking the time to get your safety framework right, including regular reviews to address changes, will be time well spent.

The following cases are discussed in this episode:

  • Gauci v DP World Brisbane Pty Limited [2024] FWC 2351
  • Woodgate v Queensland Rail [2024] FWC 3165
  • Sydney Trains v Goodsell [2024] FWCFB 401
  • Mills v Glamorgan Spring Bay Council [2025] FWC 116
  • Sydney International Container Terminals Pty Ltd v Hancock [2025] FWCFB 106
  • DP World Sydney Limited v Witherden [2025] FWCFB 133

For more on these issues, including relating to consultation, see our earlier Insight here: https://piperalderman.com.au/insight/lessons-for-employers-how-failure-to-consult-on-workplace-policy-led-to-reinstatement-of-intoxicated-worker/

To never miss an episode, subscribe via your preferred podcasting application:

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More