- within Tax topic(s)
- with Senior Company Executives, HR and Finance and Tax Executives
- in Canada
- with readers working within the Accounting & Consultancy industries
The Internal Revenue Service administers the United States federal tax system and is entrusted with extensive powers to collect revenue, conduct audits, issue tax assessments, and enforce compliance. Central to that mandate is the obligation to safeguard confidential taxpayer information. Public confidence in federal tax administration depends not only on statutory authority but also on the integrity, oversight, and accountability of IRS employees.
Unlike some jurisdictions that publish a single consolidated misconduct report, the U.S. framework addressing IRS employee misconduct is distributed across internal disciplinary systems, federal employment law, and independent oversight bodies. These mechanisms collectively govern how wrongdoing, unauthorized access, and breaches of taxpayer confidentiality are detected, investigated, disciplined, and, where necessary, prosecuted.
IRS Employee Conduct and Confidentiality Obligations
IRS employees are subject to strict confidentiality obligations under federal law. Internal Revenue Code section 6103 establishes the general rule that tax returns and return information are confidential and may only be accessed or disclosed where expressly authorized. Unauthorized inspection or disclosure, even without further dissemination, may constitute a statutory violation.
Employees receive mandatory training on confidentiality rules, ethical conduct, and data security. Access to taxpayer information is logged, monitored, and restricted to employees with a legitimate business need. Misconduct may arise from unauthorized access to accounts, improper disclosure, conflicts of interest, misuse of IRS systems, or other breaches of professional responsibility.
Oversight, Discipline, and Internal Governance
IRS employee discipline is governed by federal civil service rules and internal IRS policies set out in the Internal Revenue Manual. Corrective measures range from counseling and suspension to removal from service. These administrative processes are separate from criminal enforcement and are designed to ensure proportional discipline while respecting due process rights of federal employees.
Independent oversight is provided by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, which investigates allegations of IRS employee misconduct, fraud, waste, abuse, and violations of taxpayer rights. Where appropriate, matters may be referred to federal prosecutors for criminal charges. The existence of these oversight mechanisms reflects a governance structure intended to preserve institutional integrity while addressing individual wrongdoing.
Unauthorized Access and Disclosure of Taxpayer Information
Unauthorized access to taxpayer records remains one of the most serious categories of IRS employee misconduct. Federal law distinguishes between negligent violations and willful misconduct. Intentional unauthorized access or disclosure may expose the employee to criminal liability, while negligent violations typically result in administrative discipline.
Importantly for taxpayers, the discovery of unauthorized access does not, by itself, invalidate an IRS tax audit, tax assessment, or enforcement action. Tax administration outcomes are assessed independently from employee conduct unless a direct procedural or constitutional violation affecting the taxpayer can be established.
Criminal Prosecution of IRS Employees
While most misconduct cases are resolved through internal discipline, criminal prosecutions do occur in serious cases involving intentional breaches of confidentiality or abuse of public office. Convictions have arisen where IRS employees or contractors knowingly accessed and disseminated confidential tax information for non-official purposes.
Criminal proceedings target the individual wrongdoer and serve a deterrent and accountability function. They do not automatically alter the legal position of affected taxpayers unless the misconduct directly compromised the fairness or legality of a specific tax proceeding.
Suing the IRS for Wrongful Release of Tax Records
U.S. federal law provides taxpayers with a statutory right to seek civil damages where the IRS wrongfully discloses or permits the unauthorized inspection of confidential tax information. Under Internal Revenue Code section 7431, a taxpayer may bring a civil action against the United States where an IRS officer, employee, or agent knowingly or negligently violates confidentiality rules.
Available remedies may include statutory damages, actual damages where provable, and, in cases of willful or grossly negligent conduct, punitive damages and recovery of reasonable legal costs. These claims focus on the harm caused by the disclosure itself, rather than the correctness of any underlying tax assessment.
Recent High-Profile Litigation Involving President Trump
A significant and recent example of confidentiality litigation involves a lawsuit filed by President Donald J. Trump, members of his family, and related entities against the Internal Revenue Service and the U.S. Department of the Treasury. The claim arises from the unauthorized access and disclosure of confidential tax return information by a former IRS contractor who was criminally convicted and sentenced to imprisonment.
The lawsuit alleges that the federal government failed to implement adequate safeguards to protect sensitive taxpayer information, thereby enabling widespread disclosure and causing substantial reputational and financial harm. While the outcome remains to be determined, the case underscores that taxpayers, including high-profile individuals, may pursue civil remedies against the government for breaches of statutory confidentiality obligations.
Pro Tax Tips for U.S. Taxpayers
- Employee misconduct does not automatically invalidate IRS audits or tax assessments. Challenges must be grounded in substantive tax law or procedural violations affecting the taxpayer's rights.
- Suspected unauthorized access or disclosure should be reported to appropriate oversight authorities, as documentation may be relevant to later civil remedies.
- Civil damages claims for wrongful disclosure are distinct from tax disputes and require proof of a statutory violation and resulting harm.
- Early consultation with an experienced and knowledgeable U.S. tax lawyer is critical where confidentiality breaches intersect with audits, assessments, or enforcement actions.
Frequently Asked Questions: IRS Employee Misconduct, Civil Damages, and Administrative Remedies
Does IRS employee misconduct affect the outcome of my audit or assessment?
Generally no. Tax audits and assessments stand or fall based on statutory authority, evidence, and procedure, not on internal disciplinary matters.
What is the difference between administrative remedies and civil damages?
Administrative remedies involve internal discipline of the employee, such as suspension or termination, and are handled by the IRS and oversight bodies. Civil damages actions are brought by the taxpayer against the United States in federal court and focus on compensating the taxpayer for harm caused by unauthorized disclosure.
Can I receive compensation even if the employee is disciplined internally?
Yes. Administrative discipline and civil damages are separate processes. Employee discipline does not compensate the taxpayer, while a successful civil action may result in monetary damages.
Do I need to show financial loss to sue for wrongful disclosure?
Not always. Statutory damages may be available even where actual financial loss is difficult to quantify, although higher damages typically require proof of harm.
Can civil disclosure claims be combined with tax litigation?
They are usually pursued separately. Disclosure claims address privacy violations, while tax litigation addresses the correctness or legality of tax assessments and enforcement actions.
Conclusion
IRS governance relies on a combination of statutory confidentiality rules, internal discipline, independent oversight, and judicial remedies. While employee misconduct is taken seriously and may result in criminal prosecution or civil liability, it is legally distinct from the administration of tax audits and assessments. For taxpayers, the key distinction lies in understanding when a confidentiality breach gives rise to independent civil remedies and when tax disputes must be resolved through established administrative and litigation channels.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
