ARTICLE
23 March 2026

From Lab To Patent: Elevating Women's Contributions To Innovation

NM
Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP

Contributor

Flexibility, practical business sense, and tireless advocacy are among Nelson Mullins’ service hallmarks. Our growth over the past 120 years continues to be client-focused.

Our culture and multidisciplinary platform provide our community of clients trusted advice to meet a broad range of business needs and our team members an opportunity to be part of a Firm that values relationships, collaboration, thinking ahead, leadership within our profession, and helping those in need through pro bono and community service.

Women's History Month is an opportunity not only to celebrate women's contributions to innovation, but also to examine why those contributions remain underrepresented in the patent system.
United States Intellectual Property
Nichole Hayden’s articles from Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP are most popular:
  • within Intellectual Property topic(s)
  • with Senior Company Executives, HR and Inhouse Counsel
  • in United States
  • with readers working within the Insurance, Healthcare and Technology industries

Women's History Month is an opportunity not only to celebrate women's contributions to innovation, but also to examine why those contributions remain underrepresented in the patent system. While much attention is rightly focused on encouraging more women to enter STEM careers, the data tells us something more nuanced: even within STEM, women face structural barriers to being recognized as inventors and patent holders.

Women are less likely to be named as inventors or to participate in patent filings than their male counterparts. Historically, this is not new. For much of U.S. history, women were legally barred from owning patents and many inventions by women were published or patented in the names of husbands, employers, or male collaborators. Although those legal barriers have fallen, cultural and institutional practices continue to shape who gets credit for invention.

Several dynamics help explain the modern gap. In many organizations, invention disclosures are informal, relying on self-advocacy or manager nomination, processes that can unintentionally favor senior or more vocal employees, who are disproportionately male. Women are also more likely to work on collaborative or incremental innovations, which may be undervalued or not viewed as truly innovative.

Mentorship and education play a critical role in closing the gap. Studies show that employees who receive guidance on the patent process are far more likely to be named on patents. The encouraging takeaway is that this gap is addressable. Ideas to close the gap:

1. Formalize the invention disclosure processes – create a form document which is widely accessible and easy to complete.

2. Provide targeted patent education – teach employees how to spot patentable ideas, navigate the patent prosecution process, and engage with counsel.

3. Increase mentorship and sponsorship by senior technical leaders – pair women in technical roles with experienced inventors who can guide them through disclosures, and help build long-term patent portfolios.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More