ARTICLE
22 January 2021

Agencies Issue FAQs On SAR Filings For Covered Financial Institutions

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
FinCEN, the Federal Reserve Board, the FDIC, the National Credit Union Administration and the OCC (collectively, the "agencies") issued new guidance on suspicious activity report ("SAR") filings for covered financial institutions.
United States Finance and Banking
Christian Larson’s articles from Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP are most popular:
  • within Finance and Banking topic(s)
  • with readers working within the Banking & Credit and Media & Information industries

FinCEN, the Federal Reserve Board, the FDIC, the National Credit Union Administration and the OCC (collectively, the "agencies") issued new guidance on suspicious activity report ("SAR") filings for covered financial institutions.

The agencies clarified that a financial institution:

  • can maintain an account for which it has received a written "keep open" request from law enforcement, but it is not obliged to do so;
  • is not required to file a SAR after the receipt of a grand jury subpoena, but should determine whether a SAR filing is necessary after reviewing relevant account activity;
  • is not required to terminate a customer relationship after a SAR filing (the agencies stated that, while there is no specific number of SAR filings that must "trigger any particular escalation step," the financial institution should consider, among other things, the customer's risk profile and geographic location);
  • is not required to file a SAR based on "negative news" about a customer (e.g., reviews from the media or news articles);
  • in the case of multiple negative news alerts, is not required to independently investigate each alert;
  • need not repeat information in multiple data fields in the same SAR report; and
  • should limit the SAR narrative to remain within character limits, but if the filer must exceed the character limit, it should attach additional information instead of filing an additional report.

Commentary Christian Larson

The Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 requires FinCEN to review the current SAR-filing requirements under the Bank Secrecy Act. FinCEN also must propose any changes that will streamline the SAR reporting process for financial institutions while ensuring that SARs are "useful" to law enforcement agencies. These FAQs make clear that financial institutions need not automatically file a SAR each time a red flag of potentially suspicious activity arises. Doing so would flood FinCEN with SARs that are not "useful." Rather, financial institutions are expected to conduct an investigation in response to red flags of potentially suspicious activity and make a considered determination of whether a SAR filing is required.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More