ARTICLE
17 July 2026

CFPB’s 2026 Regulatory Agenda Tees Up Long-Awaited NPRM To Reconsider Payday Lending Rule

SM
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

Contributor

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more than 1,200 lawyers located in 16 offices worldwide, our client-centered approach is grounded in nearly a century of building enduring relationships on trust and collaboration. Our broad and diversified practices serve global clients—from startups to Fortune 500 companies—at every stage of the business cycle, including high-stakes litigation, complex transactions, sophisticated financings and regulatory issues. With leading edge technologies and innovation behind our team, we pride ourselves on being a strategic partner to our clients.
The CFPB’s 2026 Regulatory Agenda, released July 6, confirms that the Bureau intends to issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking reconsidering the remaining provisions of its 2017 Payday...
United States Consumer Protection
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • within Cannabis & Hemp and Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring topic(s)

The CFPB’s 2026 Regulatory Agenda, released July 6, confirms that the Bureau intends to issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking reconsidering the remaining provisions of its 2017 Payday, Vehicle Title, and Certain High-Cost Installment Loans Rule, including its compliance dates. The NPRM is anticipated as early as this month and is designated as a deregulatory action, consistent with the broader theme of reconsidering rules issued under prior Bureau leadership.

The rulemaking would formalize a shift the Bureau signaled more than a year ago. After a Supreme Court's decision resolved the constitutional challenge to the Bureau's funding structure, the rule's payment provisions, the only provisions remaining were a prohibition on lenders initiating further withdrawal attempts from a borrower's account after two consecutive attempts fail for insufficient funds, and (2) certain consumer notice requirements, including advance notice before a first withdrawal attempt and notice of consumer rights after two consecutive failed attempts. These provisions were to take effect March 30, 2025 but two days before that compliance date, the Bureau announced it would not prioritize enforcement or supervision with respect to penalties or fines associated with the payment withdrawal and payment disclosure provisions (previously discussed here). 

Putting It Into Practice: The forthcoming NPRM will be the first opportunity for formal industry input on the rule's scope since the payment provisions took effect. Covered lenders should keep in mind that any relief the Bureau proposes will take time to finalize and may draw legal challenge from consumer advocates. Accordingly interim compliance remains critical while the rulemaking proceeds.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More