- in Europe
- in Europe
- in Europe
- in Europe
- in Europe
- with readers working within the Accounting & Consultancy, Business & Consumer Services and Law Firm industries
- within Law Department Performance, Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring and Criminal Law topic(s)
Contracts commonly have provisions that say what is to take precedence in the event of conflicts, inconsistencies, or ambiguities between one agreement (or part or schedule) and another. The Court of Appeal has considered a very short form "confusion clause" in reinsurance certificates finding that it prioritised earlier contracts over later ones. Consequently, the English jurisdiction clause in the original contracts took precedence over the New York arbitration clause in the certificates.
Judgment: Tyson v GIC
Read the write up on our Arbitration Blog.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.