ARTICLE
30 June 2026

A New Era Of Specialised Courts For Challenges Against Turkish Regulatory Authorities’ Decisions

P
Paksoy

Contributor

Paksoy is an Istanbul-based independent Turkish law firm with over 120 employees, offering legal advice and counselling to foreign investors and the Turkish business community. We provide a wide range of services to meet the needs of local and international businesses in almost every field, including corporate law, capital markets, mergers and acquisitions, competition law, banking and finance, tax, real estate and project development, project finance, energy and infrastructure, litigation and arbitration.
A major judicial reform in Türkiye has restructured how regulatory authority decisions are reviewed, assigning technical and complex administrative disputes to specialised courts in Ankara. The new framework, which took effect in June 2026, aims to enhance judicial efficiency and develop more consistent case law across highly regulated sectors including data protection, competition, telecommunications, and energy. Companies operating in these sectors will need to monitor emerging judicial trends and re
Turkey Government, Public Sector
Serdar Paksoy’s articles from Paksoy are most popular:
  • with readers working within the Banking & Credit industries
Paksoy are most popular:
  • within Tax and Cannabis & Hemp topic(s)
  • in Middle East

A significant reform has been introduced regarding the judicial review of decisions issued by regulatory authorities in Türkiye. Pursuant to the decision of the First Chamber of the Council of Judges and Prosecutors dated 20 April 2026, technical and complex administrative disputes arising from the decisions of major regulatory authorities will henceforth be heard by designated specialised administrative courts in Ankara. The reform aims to enhance the efficiency of judicial proceedings, strengthen judicial specialisation, and contribute to greater consistency in case law.

Under the new allocation of jurisdiction, disputes arising from the decisions of the Capital Markets Board, the Turkish Competition Authority, and the Public Oversight, Accounting and Auditing Standards Authority will be adjudicated by the 10th, 13th, and 25th Administrative Courts of Ankara. Disputes arising from the decisions of the Personal Data Protection Board, the Radio and Television Supreme Council, the Information and Communication Technologies Authority, the Energy Market Regulatory Authority, and the Nuclear Regulatory Authority will be heard by the 12th, 14th, and 15th Administrative Courts of Ankara.

The new system entered into force on 1 June 2026 and applies only prospectively. Cases pending as of that date will continue to be heard by the courts currently seized of the matter, and no transfer of files will take place under the new allocation of jurisdiction.

The reform is particularly significant for challenges against decisions issued by authorities operating in highly regulated and technically complex sectors, including data protection, competition, telecommunications, media, and energy. By promoting judicial specialisation, the new framework is expected to increase predictability over time and enhance the quality of judicial review of regulatory decisions involving complex technical assessments.

This reform may also be viewed as part of a broader transformation in the judicial review of decisions issued by regulatory authorities in Türkiye. Indeed, with the enactment of Law No. 7499, the judicial remedy against administrative fines imposed under the Personal Data Protection Law No. 6698 was previously amended, replacing the review mechanism before criminal peace judgeships with judicial review before administrative courts. The latest reform takes this transformation one step further by establishing a specialization-based allocation of jurisdiction within the administrative judiciary.

The concentration of disputes before designated specialised courts is expected to contribute over time to the development of a more consistent and predictable body of case law. For companies operating in regulated sectors, this is likely to provide greater clarity regarding judicial trends in the review of regulatory authority decisions and enable more accurate assessments of potential litigation outcomes. It is therefore important for companies to closely monitor the approaches adopted by these courts, particularly in relation to administrative fines, the principle of proportionality, and the limits of regulatory authorities’ discretionary powers. Companies may also benefit from reassessing their compliance programmes, internal investigation procedures, and dispute resolution strategies in light of this increasingly specialised judicial review framework.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More