ARTICLE
25 July 2012

Bill Amending Acts To Prevent Money Laundering And Financing Of Terrorism

DB
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek N.V.

Contributor

De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek is a leading international law firm, trusted by clients for over 150 years due to its deep engagement with their businesses and a clear understanding of their ambitions. While rooted in Dutch society, the firm offers global coverage through its network of top-tier law firms, ensuring seamless, tailored legal solutions. De Brauw’s independence enables it to choose the best partners while remaining a trusted, strategic advisor to clients worldwide.

The firm emphasizes long-term investment in both its client relationships and its people. De Brauw’s legal training institutes, De Brauwerij and The Brewery, cultivate diverse talent, preparing the next generation of top-tier lawyers through rigorous training and personal development. Senior leadership traditionally rises from within, maintaining the firm’s high standards and collaborative culture.

On 19 April 2012 a bill amending the Acts to prevent money laundering and financing of terrorism was submitted to the Second Chamber of parliament.
Netherlands Government, Public Sector

On 19 April 2012 a bill amending the Acts to prevent money laundering and financing of terrorism was submitted to the Second Chamber of parliament. The bill will amend the Dutch Act on money laundering and prevention of terrorist financing and its counterpart for the BES countries. This bill aims to extend and improve the Act to prevent money laundering and financing of terrorism. The changes implement recommendations made by the FATF, in particular concerning:

  • client due diligence
  • notification of unusual transactions
  • criminal and civil indemnification of institutions that have notified the authorities of suspicious activities

The bill also provides for exchange of information between supervisors. The bill anticipates expected changes to European rules following recent recommendations of the FATF. It concerns tightening of the rules in client due diligence with regard to the client's representative and identification of front man structures, the assessment whether the ultimate beneficiary of the client can be qualified as a politically prominent person, and extension of the term 'politically prominent person' to residents of the Netherlands who do not have the Dutch nationality.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More