India: Constitutional & Administrative Law

Subscribe
Government regulation and public sector law thought leadership, articles, podcasts, videos and webinars from expert sources across the legal world. Explore insights covering topics such as fiscal and monetary policy, human rights, foreign investment, government contracts and procurement, and constitutional and administrative law.
Article
Section 37 Appeal Cannot Be Remitted To Arbitral Tribunal To Be Treated As A Section 17 Application Even By Consent: Supreme Court
In Union of India & Ors. v. Hariom Projects Pvt. Ltd. [2026 INSC 1044], the Supreme Court considered whether a High Court, while exercising appellate jurisdiction under Section 37(1)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the "Arbitration Act") against rejection of an application under Section 9, could by consent of the parties remit the appellate proceedings to a subsequently constituted arbitral tribunal and direct the tribunal to treat those proceedings as an application under Section 17.
India Litigation
Trinity Chambers
Article
Passport Is A Civil Document, Mere Pendency Of Criminal Case Prima Facie Not Ground To Withhold It: Allahabad High Court
In Mohd. Aftab v. Union of India and others, the Allahabad High Court, by an interim order dated September 14, 2026, observed that passport authorities have, prima facie, no business denying a passport merely because a criminal case is pending against the applicant. The Bench of Justice J.J. Munir and Justice Indrajeet Shukla also clarified that holding a passport does not give a person a spontaneous passage across borders.
India Criminal
IL
IndiaLaw LLP
Article
Jurisdiction And Survival: Examining The Limits Of Ed's Powers After Closure Of The Predicate Offence
The Delhi High Court has established critical boundaries on the Enforcement Directorate's authority under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, ruling that PMLA proceedings cannot survive once their underlying predicate offence is judicially closed. This landmark judgment addresses whether the ED can revive defunct investigations by substituting different scheduled offences through addendums to existing ECIRs, and examines the derivative nature of money laundering proceedings in relation
India Criminal
HS
Hammurabi & Solomon
Article
Enforcement Of The Jan Vishwas (Amendment Of Provisions) Act, 2026: Key Administrative Priorities For Regulatory Bodies
The Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2026 decriminalises numerous minor offences across central laws and introduces civil penalties and administrative adjudication mechanisms. This article analyses the key enforcement priorities and implementation challenges for regulatory bodies, inspectors, and district-level administrators to ensure effective transition from criminal prosecution to compliance-oriented governance.
India Government
Ka
Khurana and Khurana
Article
Supreme Court Reaffirming Principles Of Attorney-client Privilege - A Thorough Analysis Of The Recent Judgment In Re Summoning Advocates Who Give Legal Opinion Or Represent Parties During Investigation Of Cases And Related Issues
In a landmark judgment delivered on 31.10.2025, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India has fortified the bedrock principle of attorney-client privilege while delineating clear boundaries for investigative agencies seeking to summon advocates.
India Litigation
ML
MZM Legal
Article
Dignity In The Digital Age: Delhi High Court Reiterates The Right To Be Forgotten
On May 29, 2026, the Delhi High Court delivered a landmark judgment in a batch of petitions that raised the same question, that stood at the intersection of constitutional law and the digital age viz. whether an individual whose name appears in judicial records that are accessible through internet search engines is entitled, by virtue of the right to informational privacy guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution, to seek de-indexing of those records from name-based search results and masking of personal identifiers (including names) from publicly accessible digital versions of those records.
India Privacy
SR
S.S. Rana & Co. Advocates
Article
Distinguishing 'Conscious Possession' From Mere Presence Under NDPS Act: A Shifting Judicial Approach
The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) is among the most stringent criminal statutes in India, aiming to curb the menace of drug trafficking and substance abuse. One of the most debated legal concepts under this Act is the idea of "possession" particularly the distinction between "conscious possession" and "mere presence" near narcotic substances.
India Healthcare
ML
MZM Legal
Article
The Crime Times - Newsletter - August 2026 Edition
This issue examines a consistent judicial theme in contemporary criminal law: coercive powers must be exercised strictly within statutory and constitutional limits. The Delhi High Court has clarified that Look Out Circulars cannot be used as instruments of debt recovery. Mere loan default or financial distress, without allegations of fraud or serious economic wrongdoing, cannot justify restricting the fundamental right to travel abroad. Similarly, the Supreme Court has cautioned against continuing criminal proceedings arising from a predominantly commercial dispute after a settlement has been fully implemented and recognised by the Debt Recovery Tribunal.
India Criminal
VA
Vaish Associates Advocates
Article
Judicial Review Vs. Electoral Continuity: Understanding The Constitutional Balance
The Supreme Court of India reaffirmed the constitutional principle that judicial intervention must not disrupt ongoing electoral processes, dismissing a writ petition challenging the rejection of a Rajya Sabha nomination. The judgment reinforces that election-related disputes can only be challenged through election petitions after the electoral process concludes, maintaining the balance between judicial review and electoral continuity under Article 329(b) of the Constitution.
India Litigation
IL
IndiaLaw LLP
Article
Cure, Not Nullity: Bombay High Court Holds Post-Facto NCLT Approval Saves Premature Arbitration Invocation
Argus Partners maintains offices in Mumbai, New Delhi, and Bengaluru, providing legal services across India's major business centers. The firm operates under strict Bar Council of India regulations that prohibit solicitation and advertising, with this website serving purely informational purposes. Users must acknowledge that no attorney-client relationship is created through website access and should seek independent legal advice for specific matters.
India Commercial
AP
Argus Partners
Article
Ready Reckoner On The Law Of Look-Out Circulars: Challenges And Way Forward
The hum of the airport terminal is suddenly drowned out by a tightening in your chest. It’s supposed to be the start of a dream vacation, a special birthday trip with your family to Dubai, a celebration of togetherness, laughter, and memories to last a lifetime. But instead, here you are, standing in front of the immigration officer, heart pounding as they inform you that you cannot board your flight.
India Immigration
ML
MZM Legal
See more