ARTICLE
22 November 2013

Piercing Corporate Veil: Directors Personally And Fully Liable For Unpaid Corporate Withholding Taxes While Bankruptcy Procedures Not Yet Final

VB
Van Bael & Bellis

Contributor

Van Bael & Bellis logo
Van Bael & Bellis is a leading independent law firm based in Brussels, with a second office in Geneva dedicated to WTO matters. The firm is well known for its deep expertise in EU competition law, international trade law, EU regulatory law, as well as corporate and commercial law. With nearly 70 lawyers coming from 20 different countries, Van Bael & Bellis offers clients the support of a highly effective team of professionals with multi-jurisdictional expertise and an international perspective.
On 5 September 2013, the Belgian Supreme Court (Hof van Cassatie/Cour de Cassation) confirmed that directors of a limited liability company (naamloze vennootschap/société anonyme) are personally and fully liable for all corporate withholding taxes that remain unpaid by that company.
Belgium Corporate/Commercial Law

On 5 September 2013, the Belgian Supreme Court (Hof van Cassatie/Cour de Cassation) confirmed that directors of a limited liability company (naamloze vennootschap/société anonyme) are personally and fully liable for all corporate withholding taxes that remain unpaid by that company. The Supreme Court also held that the Belgian tax administration can reclaim the unpaid withholding taxes even before the bankruptcy procedure is finalised and the full extent of the uncollectible debt is known.

The company Axtron Group NV was declared bankrupt on 16 November 2006. Prior to the bankruptcy, for a period of 17 to 30 months, the directors of the company had consistently failed to pay the withholding taxes, even though the company had continued operating and paying wages.

Following bankruptcy, the tax administration launched legal proceedings to claim the withholding tax from the directors personally (and not from the estate), on the basis of Article 530, §1, 2nd paragraph of the Companies' Code. On 10 May 2012, the Antwerp Court of Appeal ruled in favour of the tax administration and the directors petitioned the Supreme Court to overturn the appellate judgment. The reasoning of the directors was as follows:

  • First, the directors claimed that the tax administration could not claim the unpaid withholding taxes, as all claims by and for the benefit of the company must be instituted by the official receiver.
  • Second, the directors contended that the tax administration tried to collect the withholding taxes while the official receiver had not yet closed the bankruptcy. The directors argued that the tax administration should have waited until there was an inventory of all debts and assets of the company Axtron Group NV. According to this view, the tax authorities could only collect the withholding taxes which remained unpaid after the bankruptcy was closed.

The Supreme Court rejected all arguments by the directors and confirmed the appellate judgment ordering the directors to pay the full amount of the unpaid withholding taxes.

With regard to the first argument of the directors, the Supreme Court found that the consistent refusal to pay withholding taxes over a period of 17 to 30 months caused individual damage to the tax administration. As there was no 'collective damage' to all creditors of the company Axtron Group NV (in view of the directors' personal liability), the tax administration as individual creditor was permitted to bring legal proceedings against the directors.

With regard to the second argument, the Supreme Court judged that the fact it is unsure whether a creditor will receive a sum out of a bankruptcy does not prohibit the creditor from claiming its individual damage directly from a third party. Consequently, the Supreme Court held that the tax administration could sue the directors even before the bankruptcy had been concluded.

A copy of the judgment is available at http://jure.juridat.just.fgov.be/pdfapp/download_blob?idpdf=N-20130905-3.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More