ARTICLE
3 December 2018

Agricultural Law Netletter - Wednesday, November 21, 2018 - Issue 408

MT
Miller Thomson LLP

Contributor

Miller Thomson LLP (“Miller Thomson”) is a national business law firm with approximately 500 lawyers across 5 provinces in Canada. The firm offers a full range of services in litigation and disputes, and provides business law expertise in mergers and acquisitions, corporate finance and securities, financial services, tax, restructuring and insolvency, trade, real estate, labour and employment as well as a host of other specialty areas. Clients rely on Miller Thomson lawyers to provide practical advice and exceptional value. Miller Thomson offices are located in Vancouver, Calgary, Edmonton, Regina, Saskatoon, London, Waterloo Region, Toronto, Vaughan and Montréal. For more information, visit millerthomson.com. Follow us on X and LinkedIn to read our insights on the latest legal and business developments.
A Justice of the Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench has dismissed an action to enforce a contract for the future delivery of lentils on the grounds ...
Canada Corporate/Commercial Law
Miller Thomson LLP are most popular:
  • within Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring and Cannabis & Hemp topic(s)
  • with Senior Company Executives, HR and Finance and Tax Executives
  • in Canada
  • with readers working within the Accounting & Consultancy, Banking & Credit and Insurance industries

HIGHLIGHTS

  • A Justice of the Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench has dismissed an action to enforce a contract for the future delivery of lentils on the grounds that the grain dealer seeking to enforce the contract was not licensed under the Canada Grain Act. The primary issue in the case was whether the grain dealer was exempt from registration under s. 83(2) of the Canada Grain Act on the grounds that the grain was not described by grade, and that payment for the grain was not to be made when the contract was signed or the grain was delivered. The case considers previous jurisprudence regarding the intent of licensing requirements under the Act. (Chaplin Grain Corporation v Antelope Creek Enterprises Ltd., CALN/2018-029, [2018] S.J. No. 435, Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench)

To view the full article, please click here

Originally published in LexisNexis

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More