Miller Thomson LLP are most popular:
- with Senior Company Executives, HR and Finance and Tax Executives
- with readers working within the Accounting & Consultancy, Aerospace & Defence and Insurance industries
HIGHLIGHTS
- A Justice of the Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench has dismissed an action to enforce a contract for the future delivery of lentils on the grounds that the grain dealer seeking to enforce the contract was not licensed under the Canada Grain Act. The primary issue in the case was whether the grain dealer was exempt from registration under s. 83(2) of the Canada Grain Act on the grounds that the grain was not described by grade, and that payment for the grain was not to be made when the contract was signed or the grain was delivered. The case considers previous jurisprudence regarding the intent of licensing requirements under the Act. (Chaplin Grain Corporation v Antelope Creek Enterprises Ltd., CALN/2018-029, [2018] S.J. No. 435, Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench)
To view the full article, please click here
Originally published in LexisNexis
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
