ARTICLE
15 January 2021

Mobile Advertising Company Gets Flack From FTC For Failure To Deliver Upon Advertised Promises

SM
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

Contributor

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more than 1,200 lawyers located in 16 offices worldwide, our client-centered approach is grounded in nearly a century of building enduring relationships on trust and collaboration. Our broad and diversified practices serve global clients—from startups to Fortune 500 companies—at every stage of the business cycle, including high-stakes litigation, complex transactions, sophisticated financings and regulatory issues. With leading edge technologies and innovation behind our team, we pride ourselves on being a strategic partner to our clients.
Tapjoy, Inc. ("Tapjoy"), a mobile advertising company, settled FTC allegations that it failed to provide promised in-game rewards to consumers.
United States Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • within Cannabis & Hemp topic(s)

Tapjoy, Inc. ("Tapjoy"), a mobile advertising company, settled FTC allegations that it failed to provide promised in-game rewards to consumers. Tapjoy operates an advertising platform that works within mobile games and offers in-game virtual currency to users who complete the activities of third-party advertisers (i.e. purchase products, sign up for a free trial, take a survey). Despite hundreds of consumer complaints, Tapjoy failed to deliver on its promises to consumers who earned in-game rewards.

The settlement terms prohibit Tapjoy from misleading users about the rewards they can earn and Tapjoy remains responsible for the actions and inactions of its third-party advertiser partners. Namely, the FTC held that if the third party advertisers fail to deliver on their promises, Tapjoy would be responsible for fulfilling promises made to consumers.

Though it seems intuitive, advertisers should be careful to keep their advertised promises, even if delivery on those promises hinges on third party actions. Advertisers should rely on their commercial contracts with third-party advertising partners, for the third party advertising partners' failure to deliver on their promises. However, the consumer should not be affected by the inactions of the third party advertising partner and should have a seamless consumer experience.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More