ARTICLE
1 April 2026

Office Of Space Commerce Releases Updated Mission Authorization Proposal For Novel Space Activities

KG
K&L Gates LLP

Contributor

At K&L Gates, we foster an inclusive and collaborative environment across our fully integrated global platform that enables us to diligently combine the knowledge and expertise of our lawyers and policy professionals to create teams that provide exceptional client solutions. With offices worldwide, we represent leading global corporations in every major industry, capital markets participants, and ambitious middle-market and emerging growth companies. Our lawyers also serve public sector entities, educational institutions, philanthropic organizations, and individuals. We are leaders in legal issues related to industries critical to the economies of both the developed and developing worlds—including technology, manufacturing, financial services, healthcare, energy, and more.
The Office of Space Commerce (OSC) has announced their expanded proposal for a voluntary one-stop mission authorization for novel space activities.
United States Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
K&L Gates LLP are most popular:
  • within Immigration, Transport and Law Practice Management topic(s)

The Office of Space Commerce (OSC) has announced their expanded proposal for a voluntary one-stop mission authorization for novel space activities.1 The proposal sets forth a streamlined approval process for a wide range of commercial activities that currently fall within existing regulatory gaps including: satellite servicing, nuclear-space activities, lunar missions, commercial space stations, and more.

As the firm explored2 last December, this new process would mark a paradigm shift in how the United States approves these projects. Novel mission authorization will fill a significant gap in the US's obligations under the Outer Space Treaty while encouraging the US space industry to grow and develop novel space technologies.

The cornerstone of the proposal is the "Space Commerce Certification." OSC, along with other agencies, would develop "light touch" requirements for projects seeking approval. OSC would then run interagency review for projects seeking certification using those requirements. The review process would include a presumption of approval. This presumption is supported by a requirement that applications will be approved unless OSC finds one of four explicit grounds for denial.3

OSC's vision is that the three regulatory space agencies (the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and the office for Commercial Remote Sensing Regulatory Affairs (CRSRA) would incorporate reliance on the certification to waive aspects of their regulatory reviews.

Other highlights include: A strict 120-day decision timeline, with limited extensions and a defined appeals process, and, incorporated interagency review.

OSC does not rely on notice-and-comment rulemaking, which the agency highlights as a strength that will allow them to quickly change and develop procedures over time. In this vein the OSC is not releasing mission-type specific requirements in the current process to establish a certification procedure. Instead, OSC opts to develop mission-type requirements through the implementation of the process and based on "emerging industry standards."

OSC is currently seeking industry comments and input on the proposal.

Our Policy and Regulatory lawyers are closely monitoring developments and are ready and able to help the space industry navigate this rapidly changing regulatory landscape.

Footnotes

1 OSC Releases Updated Mission Authorization Proposal – Office of Space Commerce

2 Office of Space Commerce Seeks Industry Input on Revolutionizing the US Mission Authorization Process | HUB | K&L Gates

3 These basis are: (1) "the applicant is unlikely to or incapable of complying with commitments in a certification; (2) the proposed mission has a likelihood and capacity to harm national security interests, which cannot be satisfactorily mitigated by certification conditions; (3) the proposed mission has a likelihood and capacity to cause the United States to violate its international obligations or deleteriously impact the foreign relations of the United States, which cannot be satisfactorily mitigated by certification conditions; or (4) the proposed mission has a likelihood and capacity to cause unacceptable dangers to the safety of space operations, assets, or to public safety which cannot be satisfactorily mitigated by certification conditions."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More