ARTICLE
27 November 2025

Can I Be Legally Liable For Contempt Of Court If I Lie During Employment Tribunal Proceedings?

d
didlaw

Contributor

Not just another law firm, the emphasis at didlaw has always been about providing an exceptional level of client service. This means clear and practical advice, explained in plain English. It means going the extra mile for our clients to find the right solution.

We started in 2008, focusing on helping people who were having difficulties around health and disability at work. By 2018, we were widely recognised as the UK’s leading disability discrimination lawyers.

In 2019 didlaw began a new chapter in its story. Our MD, Karen Jackson joined forces with employment barrister, Elizabeth George, to embark on the next ambitious phase of the firm’s journey.

The two women have expanded the firm’s offering to provide the same level of expertise but across all areas of employment and discrimination law. And they are committed to making didlaw a truly values-driven firm in everything that it does. You can read more about the values that drive them on our website.

In the High Court case of Commerzbank AG v Ajao, a former employee of the bank has been held to be in serious contempt of court by making false statements of truth...
United Kingdom Employment and HR
Anita Vadgama’s articles from didlaw are most popular:
  • within Employment and HR topic(s)
  • with Senior Company Executives, HR and Finance and Tax Executives
  • with readers working within the Property industries
didlaw are most popular:
  • in United States

Yes, you can.

In the High Court case of Commerzbank AG v Ajao, a former employee of the bank has been held to be in serious contempt of court by making false statements of truth, giving false statements on oath and by interfering with the administration of justice (evidence tampering/creation) during employment tribunal proceedings he brought against his former employer, Commerzbank.

A number of allegations against him were proved in the High Court to the criminal standard (beyond a reasonable doubt). The High Court concluded that the Defendant's allegations were fictitious, that he knew that what he was saying was fictitious and that the allegations were very serious.

Mr Ajao, a KYC analyst, issued two claims in the Employment Tribunals in late 2019 and early 2020, alleging multiple causes of action, including discrimination, harassment, sexual harassment, assault and wrongful dismissal. The two separate cases were consolidated and heard together in October 2021. The judgment issued on 14 February 2022 dismissed all of the claims. Commerzbank obtained a costs order against Mr Ajao for £20,000, which was unpaid at the time the contempt proceedings were commenced pursuant to CPR Part 8 (the Civil Procedure Rules).

The allegations of sexual harassment and assault against the colleague included that she had made inappropriate comments about his clothing, had told him she fancied him and had tried to grab his crotch. The High Court found that 12 of the 13 grounds of contempt were proven against him. Aside from inconsistencies in the evidence, the documentary evidence demonstrated deliberate dishonesty. The court held that there was not a "shred of truth" in his claims against one colleague and that these claims were fabricated to deceive the Employment Tribunal into awarding substantial damages.

Signing a statement of truth in a witness statement in the employment tribunal without an honest belief in its truth is capable of amounting to contempt, despite the fact that the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) have no application to ET proceedings.

Any one of the offences below will give rise to liability for contempt:

  1. A false statement of truth.
  2. Interfering with the administration of justice.
  3. Giving false evidence on oath/affirmation.

Contempt can give rise to a custodial sentence.

Other examples of contempt are listed on the GOV.UK website. You could go to prison for up to two years, get a fine or both.

More detailed information can be found on the judiciary.uk website.

Before you embark on any litigation, you must be absolutely sure that the allegations you are making are based on fact and are not fabricated. Quite aside from the risk of contempt, adverse costs or even a spell behind bars, false allegations destroy lives and careers. Think carefully if you are embarking on anything other than a fully truthful account of events which have taken place.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More