ARTICLE
3 December 2025

The Employment Rights Bill: Government Drops 'Day One' Unfair Dismissal Rights

BJ
Browne Jacobson

Contributor

Social and environmental impact are at the top of the business agenda. At Browne Jacobson, we’ve always worked across business and society, and this expertise sets us apart. Here, we champion fairness, make the complex simple and forge connections between clients to find creative solutions. This is how we improve outcomes for every person, community and business we serve.

Law needs all voices to reflect the society it serves. We’re working towards social mobility, diversity and inclusion in our firm and our profession. And we’re focusing on well-being and individuality so that all our people can thrive.

In a reversal of its manifesto commitment to offer all employees 'day one' protection from unfair dismissal...
United Kingdom Employment and HR
Tom Brennan’s articles from Browne Jacobson are most popular:
  • within Employment and HR topic(s)
  • in United Kingdom
Browne Jacobson are most popular:
  • within Employment and HR, Environment and Law Department Performance topic(s)

In a reversal of its manifesto commitment to offer all employees 'day one' protection from unfair dismissal, the Government has agreed to reduce the qualifying period required for an employee to bring an unfair dismissal claim, from two years to six months.

How did we get here?

As we set out in our previous Employment Rights Bill update, the Bill is in a stage known as 'ping-pong', with the House of Lords insisting on key amendments, requiring the Bill to return to the House of Commons for consideration of the changes proposed by the Lords.

On 27 November 2025, it was announced that the Bill would return to the House Commons on 8 December 2025. Later that day, the Government issued a press release confirming that it would be rowing back on its manifesto pledge of introducing unfair dismissal protections as a 'day one' right.

What did the press release say?

1. Qualifying period to be reduced to six months

The press release confirmed that following "constructive conversations" with trade unions and business representatives, it had been agreed that reducing the qualifying period for unfair dismissal from two years to six months was a "workable package".

It should be remembered that employees who are dismissed for an 'automatically unfair' reason (such as pregnancy or making a protected disclosure) will remain protected from unfair dismissal from 'day one'.

2. Change to be made by primary legislation

The press release confirmed the unfair dismissal qualifying period "can only be varied by primary legislation", as opposed to the existing power of variation under section 209 Employment Rights Act 1996.

This will mean that it will be more difficult for future governments to make any subsequent changes to the qualifying period.

3. Removal of the compensation cap?

While the press release was clear on the position regarding unfair dismissal protections, it somewhat vaguely stated that the:

"compensation cap [for unfair dismissal claims] will be lifted."

The current compensatory award which may be awarded in a successful unfair dismissal claim is currently capped at the lower of 52 weeks' gross pay or £118,223. It is unclear whether the Government:

  • proposes to lift this cap altogether – meaning awards of compensation will be unlimited (as is the case in discrimination and whistleblowing claims);
  • proposes to lift 'part of' the cap – removing either the '52 weeks' gross pay' or '£118,223' aspect of the cap; or
  • proposes to increase the existing cap – increasing the maximum compensation which can be claimed under the cap (however, this appears unlikely given the cap limit is reviewed annually in April).

The Government's intention should hopefully become clear as the Bill progresses.

Next steps

As noted in the press release, the Government believes the resolution of this issue will enable it to move forward to ensure the Bill "can reach Royal Assent and keep to the Government's published delivery timeline".

While there are still key areas of contention which remain (notably, the offer of guaranteed hours for zero/low hours workers, trade union ballot thresholds and the automatic opt in of trade union members to political funds), given the Government's concession on unfair dismissal rights, it may be that the Lords back down on the remaining areas of contention, should the House of Commons refuse to pass the Lords' amendments on its next reading on 8 December.

This course of action may allow the Bill to receive Royal Assent before Christmas. We'll continue to keep a close eye on the Bill and provide further updates in due course.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More