ARTICLE
11 December 2025

Bill 17 Proposed Building Code Amendments: Occupancy Permits For Residential Developments With Deferred Development Charges

DH
Davies Howe

Contributor

Davies Howe LLP is a Toronto-based boutique law firm specializing in land use planning and development, expropriation, and litigation. The firm represents developers, businesses, and private landowners, providing strategic, practical advice and advocacy on complex land use planning, regulatory, and dispute matters across Ontario.

Bill 17 amended the Development Charges Act, 1997 (the "DCA") to allow development charges for residential developments to be deferred to either the issuance of an occupancy permit or the first occupancy of the building, whichever is earlier.
Canada Real Estate and Construction
Michael Cook’s articles from Davies Howe are most popular:
  • with readers working within the Property and Construction & Engineering industries
Davies Howe are most popular:
  • within Transport topic(s)

Bill 17 amended the Development Charges Act, 1997 (the "DCA") to allow development charges for residential developments to be deferred to either the issuance of an occupancy permit or the first occupancy of the building, whichever is earlier. These amendments have not yet been proclaimed into force.

On October 3, 2025, the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing ("MMAH") posted a regulatory proposal to the Ontario Regulatory Registry proposing amendments to O. Reg. 163/24, the Building Code, to operate alongside these changes, providing assurance that development charges will be collected after deferral.

The proposal would impose a requirement for an occupancy permit for non-rental residential buildings, including stacked townhouses, where a builder elects to defer development charges under s. 26.1(3.1) of the DCA. This would include buildings that have been completed but are not yet occupied and may not presently require an occupancy permit. Further, it is proposed that the chief building official's authority would be expanded to withhold issuance of an occupancy permit until the development charges have been paid in full.

The changes are not proposed to buildings which are not subject to a development charge deferral, to rental or institutional buildings which have development charge deferrals or where a late payment agreement under s.37 of the DCA is in place.

MMAH is seeking feedback on the practical considerations of withholding occupancy permits, the treatment of phased or partial occupancy, whether there is support for extending the time for municipalities to complete a prescribed inspection to permit occupancy, and any consequential improvements to occupancy-related provisions or other supports. The regulatory proposal is open for comment until October 17, 2025.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More