ARTICLE
10 July 2015

Alabama Department Of Revenue Wisely Withdraws Controversial Proposal

BA
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

Contributor

Bradley is a national law firm with a reputation for skilled legal work, exceptional client service, and impeccable integrity. Our more than 750 attorneys provide business clients around the world with a full suite of legal services in dozens of industries and practice areas. Bradley’s 13 offices are located in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and the District of Columbia, giving us an extensive geographic base to represent clients on a regional, national, and international basis. We frequently serve as national coordinating counsel, regional counsel, and statewide counsel for clients in various industries.

It is uncertain whether the Legislature will take up this issue in the likely special session later this summer or perhaps will defer consideration until the 2016 regular session.
United States Tax

Yesterday afternoon, the Alabama Department of Revenue (ADOR) withdrew its controversial proposed digital tax regulation, Rule 810-6-5-09, likely in response to the request of the Legislative Council's newly-appointed Chairman, Senator Paul Sanford (R-Madison/Huntsville). In a letter sent to the Commissioner of Revenue last week, Senator Sanford warned that he would convene a meeting of the Council next Wednesday to consider rejecting the regulation. Senator Sanford's letter was consistent with the letter delivered to the Commissioner on the date of the administrative hearing on the proposed regulation. There were similar calls to withdraw the proposal by legislative leaders, many in the business community, and some in the media, largely based on the argument that the proposed regulation exceeded the scope of the ADOR's rule-making authority and was instead within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Legislature to consider.
Despite this announcement by the ADOR, it is unknown whether the ADOR will make any attempts in the future to tax these types of digital services without legislative approval. It is uncertain whether the Legislature will take up this issue in the likely special session later this summer or perhaps will defer consideration until the 2016 regular session (or later).

The authors served as local counsel to the Digital Goods and Services Coalition, one of the many groups that opposed the regulation.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More