- with readers working within the Pharmaceuticals & BioTech industries
On April 8, 2026, the Division of Corporation Finance (the “Division”) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) agreed that it would not object to a foreign issuer’s use of “notice and access” pursuant to Rule 14a-16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), to furnish proxy materials, even though the issuer is unable to comply with the timing requirements of the Rule due to conflicting local law requirements. The foreign issuer agreed to comply with certain conditions in connection with its reliance on Rule 14a-16, as detailed below.
Elastic, N.V. (the “Company”) is a private limited liability company incorporated under Dutch law, and is subject to Exchange Act reporting requirements applicable to U.S. domestic companies because it does not meet the requirements to be a foreign private issuer under Exchange Act Rule 3b-4(c). Specifically relevant here, the Company is subject to the proxy rules in Regulation 14A in connection with shareholder meetings. Exchange Act Rule 14a-3 requires that a company furnish proxy materials to its shareholders either concurrently with, or prior to, the solicitation of their vote at a shareholder meeting; Rule 14a-16 permits companies to meet this requirement by furnishing shareholders with a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Material (the “Notice”) at least 40 calendar days before the meeting, instead of providing printed proxy materials. However, under Dutch law, the record date for determining the shareholders entitled to attend and vote at any such meeting is set 28 days before the meeting. This means that the Company will not have a list of shareholders entitled to notice of a meeting subsequent to the 40th calendar day before the meeting, as required to take advantage of “notice and access” pursuant to Rule 14a-16.
Rule 14a-16 is intended to provide an easy, cost-effective means of providing meeting information and proxy materials to shareholders, allowing companies to avoid the time and expense of printing these documents. The Division Staff agreed that it would not object to the Company’s reliance on Rule 14a-16, assuming that it (i) files its definitive proxy statement with the SEC and makes these materials available on its website at least 40 calendar days in advance of the meeting, (ii) issues a press release announcing the availability of these materials, its intent to use notice and access, the anticipated date of the Notice, and how shareholders can request hard copies of the materials, at least 40 calendar days in advance of the meeting, and (iii) distributes the Notice as quickly as possible after the record date (planned to be expedited to five business days after such date, at additional cost to the Company).
In its letter to the Division, the Company highlighted the facts that a very large majority of its shareholders vote electronically, and very few request paper copies of proxy materials. In addition, any paper copies requested are generally sent within 72 hours of such request. Thus, notice and access is an efficient and cost-effective way of reaching the Company’s shareholders, thereby benefitting both the Company and these shareholders (who ultimately bear the costs of paper proxy materials) while providing all parties, even those who request paper copies, with sufficient time to review the materials.
Read the Elastic, N.V. letter here.
Visit us at mayerbrown.com
Mayer Brown is a global services provider comprising associated legal practices that are separate entities, including Mayer Brown LLP (Illinois, USA), Mayer Brown International LLP (England & Wales), Mayer Brown (a Hong Kong partnership) and Tauil & Chequer Advogados (a Brazilian law partnership) and non-legal service providers, which provide consultancy services (collectively, the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are established in various jurisdictions and may be a legal person or a partnership. PK Wong & Nair LLC ("PKWN") is the constituent Singapore law practice of our licensed joint law venture in Singapore, Mayer Brown PK Wong & Nair Pte. Ltd. Details of the individual Mayer Brown Practices and PKWN can be found in the Legal Notices section of our website. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of Mayer Brown.
© Copyright 2026. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.
This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.
[View Source]