ARTICLE
3 February 2010

Federal Circuit Determines Proper Calculation Of Patent Term Adjustment For Issued Patents

BT
Barnes & Thornburg LLP

Contributor

In a changing marketplace, Barnes & Thornburg stands ready at a moment’s notice, adapting with agility and precision to achieve your goals. As one of the 100 largest law firms in the United States, our 800 legal professionals in 23 offices put their collective experience to work so you can succeed.
On Jan. 7, 2010, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit announced a decision that requires the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to calculate patent term adjustment (PTA) in a manner that could allow additional protection term for many U.S. patents. Wyeth v. Kappos, No. 2009-1120 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 7, 2010).
United States Intellectual Property
Barnes & Thornburg LLP are most popular:
  • within Privacy and Accounting and Audit topic(s)

On Jan. 7, 2010, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit announced a decision that requires the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to calculate patent term adjustment (PTA) in a manner that could allow additional protection term for many U.S. patents. Wyeth v. Kappos, No. 2009-1120 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 7, 2010). In September 2008, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia held that the USPTO's methods of calculating PTA were incorrect under the statutory requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 154. In its recent decision, the Federal Circuit upheld the lower court's decision and determined that the statute as written by Congress has been misinterpreted by the USPTO. Accordingly, patentees may be entitled to an additional term of protection for their issued patents.

The Patent Guarantee Act of 1999, codified at 35 U.S.C. § 154(b), and effective for utility patents issuing from applications filed on or after May 29, 2000, provides three distinct means of PTA, referred to as "delays":

  1. "A Delay": Guarantees extension of patent term due to the USPTO's failure to meet deadlines for examining a patent application (e.g. failure to issue a first office action within fourteen months, failure to respond to the Applicant's reply within four months, etc.). 35 U.S.C. § 154(b)(1)(A).
  2. "B Delay": Guarantees extension of patent term due to the USPTO's failure to issue a patent within three years of filing a patent application. 35 U.S.C. § 154(b)(1)(B).
  3. "C Delay": Guarantees extension of patent term due to the involvement of a patent application in an interference, a secrecy order, or a successful appeal. (35 U.S.C. § 154(b)(1)(C)).

However, the statute also provides that a patent's final PTA is reduced by any "overlap" in the prescribed periods of delay. Specifically, the statute provides that "the period of any adjustment [cannot] exceed the actual number of days the issuance of the patent was delayed." 35 U.S.C. § 154(b)(2)(A). Therefore, different periods of delay cannot be "double-counted"; if a calendar day is included under more than one period of delay, then it only accounts for one day of PTA. The issue in Wyeth concerned when the periods of delay overlap and how this determination affects the calculation of PTA.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More