ARTICLE
1 October 2025

Commerce Opens Section 232 Investigations On PPE/medical Equipment And Robotics/industrial Machinery

CH
Clark Hill

Contributor

At Clark Hill, our value proposition is simple. We offer our clients an exceptional team, dedicated to the delivery of outstanding service. We recruit and develop talented individuals and empower them to contribute to our rich diversity of legal and industry experience. With locations spanning across the United States, Ireland, and Mexico, we work in agile, collaborative teams, partnering with our clients to help them reach and exceed their business goals.

Clark Hill. Simply Smarter.

On Sept. 2, the Department of Commerce ("DOC") launched two new Section 232 national security investigations. The notice of these investigations was published in the Federal Register on Sept. 26.
United States International Law
Mark R. Ludwikowski’s articles from Clark Hill are most popular:
  • within International Law topic(s)
  • in United States
Clark Hill are most popular:
  • within International Law, Consumer Protection, Litigation and Mediation & Arbitration topic(s)

On Sept. 2, the Department of Commerce ("DOC") launched two new Section 232 national security investigations. The notice of these investigations was published in the Federal Register on Sept. 26. The targets: imports of personal protective equipment ("PPE") and medical equipment, and imports of robotics and industrial machinery.

Why now? Because supply chains – once an afterthought – are now seen as the soft underbelly of national security. COVID-19 exposed the danger of overreliance on foreign sources. The administration seeks to address these supply chain vulnerabilities and advance the strategic importance of domestic manufacturing and medical technologies.

What's at stake

Section 232 gives the government authority to restrict imports if they threaten national security. In practice, that has meant tariffs. First steel and aluminum, then autos and auto parts. Now, medical gear and robotics.

The DOC's Bureau of Industry and Security ("BIS") is asking for public input. The comment window runs until Oct. 17. Stakeholders – manufacturers, importers, healthcare providers – have just three weeks to weigh in.

The PPE and medical equipment investigation

The first inquiry covers a wide range from syringes and IV pumps to hospital beds, wheelchairs, and sophisticated devices. BIS wants to know:

  • Can U.S. producers meet current and future demand?
  • How dependent are we on foreign suppliers?
  • Are prices distorted by subsidies or predatory practices?

In plain terms, can America make what it needs, or is it vulnerable to supply disruptions, or worse, economic coercion?

The agency is clearly noting national security concerns as it evaluates potential concentration risks from reliance on limited suppliers, the effects of predatory trade practices, and the impact of artificially suppressed prices due to unfair trade or state-sponsored overproduction. This concern about the "weaponization" of foreign supplies means the BIS is considering all options, including the potential for export restrictions, the feasibility of expanding domestic production, and whether tariffs or quotas can effectively be used to address supply chain vulnerabilities.

The robotics and industrial machinery investigation

The second probe casts a wide net: computer numerical control ("CNC") machining centers, presses, milling machines, industrial ovens, laser cutters, and more. Only unmanned aircraft systems are excluded.

BIS is asking similar questions: what is the scale of U.S. demand, where do imports come from, and how much of that market is underwritten by foreign subsidies? The agency is also weighing national security directly: what happens if foreign‑built machines, critical to aerospace, defense, or advanced manufacturing, become tools of leverage?

Impact

If the past is prologue, these reviews could reshape entire industries:

  • Healthcare providers and device makers may face higher costs or restricted access to critical supplies.
  • Manufacturers in automotive, aerospace, and high‑tech sectors may see robotics and machine tools caught up in new tariffs.

For businesses, the 21‑day comment period is not a formality. It is the only opportunity to shape the record before BIS draws conclusions, and before tariffs are imposed.

Companies in healthcare, robotics, and manufacturing should assess exposure now. Submitting comments can help ensure your concerns are heard.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More