- within Food, Drugs, Healthcare and Life Sciences topic(s)
- in United States
- with readers working within the Healthcare industries
- within Law Practice Management topic(s)
Through our Viewpoints series, Riveron experts share their opinions on current topics, business trends, and industry news.
Heading into 2026, private equity sponsors are now confronting a reality the industry has avoided for a decade: the traditional value-creation playbook in healthcare and life sciences is under significant pressure. Margin expansion, once reliable through scale, procurement leverage, and basic operational cleanup, is up against obstacles greater than have been seen historically. The collision of labor inflation, payer resistance, regulatory pressure, and clinical workforce burnout has pushed even strong assets into underperformance.
Today's landscape has exposed an uncomfortable truth: many healthcare PE portfolios are structurally misaligned with the environment they now operate in.
Operating Obstacles
The first challenge is the compression of operating leverage. Many PE sponsors who bought into multi-site roll-ups or platform plays believed scale would drive efficiency. Instead, they face wage escalation, productivity degradation, and staffing shortages – all things that erase the very synergies underwriting their deals. Nursing, behavioral health clinicians, lab technicians, and revenue-cycle talent remain chronically constrained.
Payer Pressures
The game has changed with payers. Medicaid redeterminations, denials at historic highs, aggressive recoupments, and value-based pressure have squeezed top-line growth. Revenue cycle management (RCM) performance is not simply a back-office issue; it is now an existential threat to EBITDA. Some sponsors have underestimated the sophistication and speed with which payers would weaponize data, AI, prior authorization, and contract loopholes to reduce reimbursement.
Complicated Context
The regulatory landscape has subjected organizations to sharper scrutiny and turned platform strategies into vulnerable zones. From the FTC's challenge of consolidation to DOJ oversight of behavioral health and highly complex SUD billing, sponsors are learning that "compliance infrastructure" must now be a forethought. In 2025, several high-growth platforms have slowed or reversed course because operational challenges and performance issues are magnified when scaling a model amid changing market dynamics.
And yet, the real headwinds are coming in 2026.
Preparing for 2026 in PE-backed Healthcare
2026 will bring a capital-structure crisis for over-levered assets that had been underwritten before rate hikes. Refinancing will expose fragile cash flows. Distress will spike across physician services, RCM, diagnostics, contract research, senior care, and digital health—especially among companies that relied on growth projections instead of operator-led fundamentals.
Second, we will see an industry-wide reset of valuation expectations. Sponsors who prefer not to mark down assets or confront broken theses will fall behind those willing to pivot aggressively.
Finally, the largest headwind in 2026 will be the talent gap. Firms that do not embed true operators—executives and physicians who have built, run, and turned around healthcare businesses—will undoubtedly struggle. Playbooks won't save portfolios, but professionals with real-world experience will.
For PE-backed healthcare organizations, 2026 won't reward financial engineering. It will reward execution.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.