ARTICLE
30 January 2025

Bipartisan AGs Support Universal Service Fund

CO
Cozen O'Connor

Contributor

Founded in 1970, Cozen O’Connor has more than 925 attorneys practicing internationally in 32 cities across North America and Europe. We are a full-service firm with award-winning practices in litigation, business law, and government relations, and our attorneys have experience operating in all sectors of the economy. Our diverse client list includes global Fortune 500 companies, middle-market firms poised for growth, ambitious startups, and high-profile individuals.

A bipartisan coalition of 22 AGs and the Maine Office of the Public Advocate filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court...
United States Strategy
  • A bipartisan coalition of 22 AGs and the Maine Office of the Public Advocate filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in consolidated cases FCC v. Consumers' Research (No. 24-354) and Schools, Health & Libraries Broadband Coalition v. Consumers' Research (No. 24-422), urging the Court to reverse the lower court's decision invalidating the Universal Service Fund (USF).
  • In the brief, the AGs argue that the USF, which was established as part of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 to promote communications services infrastructure including in rural communities, has provided the benefits Congress intended, and they argue that this case does not raise nondelegation doctrine concerns.
  • The AGs request that the Court reverse the lower court's decision and affirm the constitutionality of the USF.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More