- within Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring and International Law topic(s)
Summary
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has proposed government-wide regulations for all federal financial assistance that would centralize more authority in OMB and reduce agencies’ discretion. Today, federal agencies—including the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)—implement the OMB Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Part 200 (Uniform Guidance) and can tailor requirements to reflect program statutes and operational realities. If finalized, the proposal would significantly expand OMB’s influence over how federal financial assistance is administered across agencies.
Why This Matters
OMB is relying on its authority to set government-wide financial management policies to remove language stating that 2 CFR Part 200 is administrative guidance. That shift could create new legal and practical uncertainty over which rules control when the Uniform Guidance conflicts with agency regulations.
Currently, agency regulations adopted through notice-and-comment rulemaking generally take precedence over the Uniform Guidance. Under the proposal, the Uniform Guidance and agency rules would sit on more equal footing as a matter of administrative law—while agencies would still be responsible for ensuring compliance with their underlying program statutes. The result could be more disputes, more confusion, and fewer program-specific flexibilities.
Broad Reach Across HUD Programs
The Uniform Guidance already applies broadly to federal financial assistance—not just discretionary grants. Within HUD, it applies to essentially all grant programs, including entitlement programs such as Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) and the p 8 program, and in more limited ways to loans under the Federal Housing Administration and Ginnie Mae operations.
Potential Loss of HUD-Specific Flexibilities
HUD programs currently include carve-outs and tailored approaches that deviate from the Uniform Guidance. For example:
- The HOME program excludes certain Uniform Guidance provisions by regulation.
- HUD has allowed public housing agency (PHA) joint venture partners to obtain exceptions to Uniform Guidance procurement requirements.
If OMB’s proposal is finalized, HUD may have less room to preserve these program-specific adjustments, if not required by their authorizing statutes.
Key Substantive Changes OMB Is Proposing
OMB’s proposal also includes several policy and compliance changes that could directly affect PHAs, affordable housing developers, and other recipients, including:
- New pre-award review and risk-evaluation requirements, including senior agency review of selected proposals.
- A requirement that all federal grant recipients enroll in E-Verify.
- New national policy restrictions stating that federal award funds may not be used for DEIA, “gender ideology,” or gender transition services for inpiduals under 19.
- A requirement to obtain awarding-agency preapproval before using federal grant funds to attend conferences.
Related HUD Proposal Highlighted in the Rulemaking
HUD is also proposing a change tied to the rulemaking: expanding nonprocurement debarment and suspension coverage to subcontractors when the contract is expected to be $25,000 or more.
Public Comment Period
The proposed rule, accessible here, is currently available for public comment. There is a shortened 45-day comment period. The comment period closes on July 13, 2026.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
[View Source]
