ARTICLE
22 June 2026

Word On The Street: State AGs Set Their Sights On Data Centers And Affordable Housing

B
Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff LLP

Contributor

Benesch, an Am Law 200 firm with over 450 attorneys, combines top-tier talent with an agile, modern approach to solving clients’ most complex challenges across diverse industries. As one of the fastest-growing law firms in the country, Benesch continues to earn national recognition for its legal prowess, commitment to client service and dedication to fostering an outstanding workplace culture.
Democratic state attorneys general are prioritizing increased oversight of data centers and aggressively expanding enforcement around affordable housing, using a mix of litigation, regulation...
United States Michigan Government, Public Sector
Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff LLP are most popular:
  • within Litigation and Mediation & Arbitration topic(s)

Key Takeaways

  • Democratic state attorneys general are prioritizing increased oversight of data centers and aggressively expanding enforcement around affordable housing, using a mix of litigation, regulation and advocacy to address community and consumer concerns.
  • Businesses in these sectors face increased scrutiny and potential enforcement actions, especially if they fail to address community concerns or create unsafe conditions. State AGs are prepared to use litigation and other tools to protect residents and promote policy goals.
  • Proactively engage with state AG offices and local stakeholders, ensure compliance (e.g., environmental planning for data centers, safe and accurate housing practices), and come prepared with transparent, community-focused strategies to mitigate risk and position your business as a cooperative partner.

Introduction

The Benesch State Attorneys General team recently sat down with many Democratic state attorneys general to better understand their priorities for the remainder of the year. Two issues topped their agendas: data centers and affordable housing. A recurring theme emerged from these conversations—state AGs are carefully weighing when to use their litigation powers versus other tools like regulation, advisory guidance or advocacy. Here are key insights for businesses operating in these areas.

Key Insights from AG Conversations

a. Data Centers a Potential Third Rail

Democratic AGs are divided on how states should approach large data center projects and what role AGs should play in this policy space. However, they all agree on one point: litigation options have been limited so far. The only active data center litigation to date was brought by the Michigan AG seeking an unredacted copy of a contract between Oracle and a power company related to a new data center project.

Although AGs differ on whether data centers benefit their communities, they share common concerns voiced by residents: the environmental impact of massive energy consumption, rising energy costs for consumers and potential job losses as AI capabilities expand. Even AGs who support data center development raised these concerns and discussed using regulatory and advocacy powers to protect citizens from potential downsides. All the AGs present emphasized that companies building data centers should come prepared with plans to address these concerns, remain open to community input and operate as responsible local partners—something state AGs can and will help facilitate. Companies that fail to do so may face more aggressive enforcement and advocacy.

b. Affordable Housing: Enforcement Is Ramping Up

Every jurisdiction faces an affordable housing crisis, and state AGs are deploying their full range of tools to address it. On the enforcement front, AGs are aggressively pursuing landlords who exploit vulnerable tenants. For example, the D.C. AG recently filed a racketeering suit against a landlord who misrepresented to lenders how funds would be used to improve properties—all while those properties had active, unaddressed safety hazards. Many AGs have also created specialized units within their offices to tackle affordable housing, combining affirmative litigation, regulatory enforcement and guidance, and educational and advocacy efforts to promote policies that increase housing supply and affordability at both local and state levels.

State AGs are also thinking broadly about solutions and want to build coalitions to implement them. These coalitions would include local and state officials alongside industry partners who can help increase housing supply and expand financing options. The goal is to create outcomes that benefit everyone. With limited federal action expected over the next three years, state AGs see themselves as well positioned to fill the void. Companies in this space should consider building relationships with state AGs to join these coalitions—while ensuring they are not creating unsafe conditions for consumers that could trigger enforcement action.

How to Position Your Business

Democratic AGs intend to be active regulators, enforcers, and advocates on affordable housing and data center issues. Companies operating in these spaces should consider developing relationships with state AGs and their offices. Establishing collaborative relationships with local and state officials, as well as community stakeholders, can improve the likelihood of long-term operational success and reduce regulatory and enforcement risk.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More