ARTICLE
24 March 2026

Massachusetts Settlement Targets Mortgage-Backed "Homeowner Benefit” Agreements

SM
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

Contributor

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more than 1,200 lawyers located in 16 offices worldwide, our client-centered approach is grounded in nearly a century of building enduring relationships on trust and collaboration. Our broad and diversified practices serve global clients—from startups to Fortune 500 companies—at every stage of the business cycle, including high-stakes litigation, complex transactions, sophisticated financings and regulatory issues. With leading edge technologies and innovation behind our team, we pride ourselves on being a strategic partner to our clients.
On March 11, Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell announced a consent order with a real estate-related lender’s subsidiary...
United States Massachusetts Finance and Banking
A.J. Dhaliwal’s articles from Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • with readers working within the Aerospace & Defence industries
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • within Cannabis & Hemp topic(s)

On March 11, Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell announced a consent order with a real estate-related lender's subsidiary, and affiliated individuals resolving allegations that the company violated the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act by deceptively marketing mortgage-backed "Homeowner Benefit Agreements" to financially struggling homeowners.

According to the complaint, the company offered homeowners relatively small upfront cash payments, typically less than $1,500, in exchange for a 40-year exclusive right to act as the listing broker if the homeowner later sold the property. The Attorney General alleged that the agreements also triggered substantial payment obligations upon other transfers, including death or foreclosure, and that the transactions were secured by recorded mortgages that could interfere with refinancing, home-equity access, or the ability to sell the home. The complaint further alleged that the company marketed the product to vulnerable consumers searching for loans or public benefits while obscuring the true nature of the transaction.

The Attorney General alleged that consumers were left unaware that they had encumbered their homes through mortgages tied to the transactions. The Attorney General alleged that the company did not provide documents in advance, used small-font paperwork, and rushed consumers through signing without ensuring they understood the nature of the transaction.

Putting It Into Practice: State regulators remain focused on consumer-facing products and marketing practices that may affect homeowners and other financially vulnerable consumers (previously discussed here). Courts and regulators continue to scrutinize consumer-facing products where marketing, disclosures, or sales practices may obscure the nature of the transaction and take advantage of a consumer's lack of understanding of transaction terms. Companies offering similar products should review their marketing, disclosures, contract terms, and sales practices carefully in light of continued state scrutiny.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More