ARTICLE
14 June 2021

Firm Settles FINRA Charges For OATS And OTCRF Reporting Failures

HL
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Contributor

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes matters.

Operating at the intersection of business, finance, and government, we bring an unwavering commitment to client service and the decisive counsel that helps clients achieve exceptional results.

Consistently recognized for innovation across legal services, we combine sharp judgment with deep commercial perspective and intellectual rigor to address critical, cutting-edge challenges.

With 3,100 lawyers worldwide, we offer global scale with strong local insight in the markets that matter most. Our commitment extends beyond client work through pro bono activities, community investment, and responsible business practices.

A firm settled FINRA charges for failing to submit accurate trade information to the Order Audit Trail System ("OATS") and the Over-the-Counter Reporting Facility ("OTCRF").
United States Finance and Banking
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader are most popular:
  • within Intellectual Property, International Law, Litigation and Mediation & Arbitration topic(s)

A firm settled FINRA charges for failing to submit accurate trade information to the Order Audit Trail System ("OATS") and the Over-the-Counter Reporting Facility ("OTCRF").

In a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent, FINRA found that the firm submitted reports to the OATS that contained inaccurate account type codes and order-received timestamps, in violation of FINRA Rules 7450(a) ("General Requirement") and 2010 ("Standards of Commercial Honor and Principles of Trade"). Additionally, FINRA found that the firm failed to include the riskless portion of the riskless-principal transactions in reports submitted to the OTCRF, in violation of FINRA Rule 6622(d)(3)(B) ("Reporting Principal and Riskless Principal Transactions - Exception"). The firm attributed all of the violations to its adoption of a new order management system.

To settle the charges, the firm agreed to (i) a censure and (ii) a $30,000 total fine, composed of a $16,000 fine for its violation of FINRA Rules 7450 and 2010, and a $14,000 fine for its violation of FINRA Rule 6622.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More