ARTICLE
2 December 2020

Firm Settles FINRA Charges For OATS Reporting Violations

HL
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Contributor

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes matters.

Operating at the intersection of business, finance, and government, we bring an unwavering commitment to client service and the decisive counsel that helps clients achieve exceptional results.

Consistently recognized for innovation across legal services, we combine sharp judgment with deep commercial perspective and intellectual rigor to address critical, cutting-edge challenges.

With 3,100 lawyers worldwide, we offer global scale with strong local insight in the markets that matter most. Our commitment extends beyond client work through pro bono activities, community investment, and responsible business practices.

A firm settled FINRA charges for Order Audit Trail System reporting violations and written supervisory procedure failings.
United States Finance and Banking
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader are most popular:
  • within Intellectual Property, International Law, Litigation and Mediation & Arbitration topic(s)

A firm settled FINRA charges for Order Audit Trail System ("OATS") reporting violations and written supervisory procedure ("WSPs") failings.

In a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent, FINRA found that the firm (i) transmitted over 1.5 billion reportable order events ("ROEs") to OATS with inaccurate information, (ii) transmitted approximately 71 million execution reports to OATS that failed to link to a media-reported trade report, (iii) failed to transmit over 2 million ROEs to OATS, and (iv) failed to repair over 3 million rejected ROEs. As a result, FINRA found that the firm violated FINRA Rules 7450(b) ("Order Data Transmission Requirements; Method and Timing of Transmitting Data") and 2010 ("Standards of Commercial Honor and Principles of Trade").

Further, FINRA found that the firm failed to maintain sufficient WSPs to ensure compliance with OATS reporting obligations. FINRA explained that the firm's WSPs provided that a designated reviewer sample a minimum of five orders "of various types" every quarter to establish the accuracy of OATS information. FINRA stated that given the approximately 9 billion ROEs the firm transmitted to OATS on a quarterly basis, the minimum sample of five order types was "unreasonably narrow." As a result, FINRA found the firm violated FINRA Rule 3110(a) ("Supervision; Supervisory System").

To settle charges, the firm agreed to (i) be censured, (ii) pay a $120,000 fine, and (iii) remediate the firm's supervisory systems so as to achieve OATS reporting compliance.

 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More