ARTICLE
15 April 2015

President Obama Vetoes Congressional Resolution Aimed At Blocking The NLRB’s "Quickie Election" Rule

BA
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

Contributor

Bradley is a national law firm with a reputation for skilled legal work, exceptional client service, and impeccable integrity. Our more than 750 attorneys provide business clients around the world with a full suite of legal services in dozens of industries and practice areas. Bradley’s 13 offices are located in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and the District of Columbia, giving us an extensive geographic base to represent clients on a regional, national, and international basis. We frequently serve as national coordinating counsel, regional counsel, and statewide counsel for clients in various industries.

On March 31, 2015, President Obama used the fourth veto of his presidency to prevent passage of S.J. Res. 8, a congressional resolution aimed at blocking implementation of the NLRB’s "Quickie Election" Rule.
United States Employment and HR

On March 31, 2015, President Obama used the fourth veto of his presidency to prevent passage of S.J. Res. 8, a congressional resolution aimed at blocking implementation of the NLRB's "Quickie Election" Rule. The NLRB Rule, which will benefit organized labor by speeding up the union election process, is set to go into effect on April 14, 2015.

The congressional resolution, which passed the Senate (53 to 46) and the House (232 to 186) in March, would have prevented the NLRB from implementing the "Quickie Election" Rule. The President's veto effectively means that the resolution is dead because it appears that the Republican majority does not have the votes necessary to override the veto. Union leaders have trumpeted the President's action.

The business community's hopes in derailing the "Quickie Election" Rule are now down to the possibility of obtaining some sort of favorable judicial relief. Federal lawsuits challenging the Rule have been filed in Texas and the District of Columbia. However, a decision on the Rule's validity has not been issued in either case and the ultimate outcome is uncertain. Unless one of the federal courts acts soon to enjoin implementation, the Rule will go into effect on April 14, at least temporarily, until the legal challenges are resolved.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More