ARTICLE
16 March 2026

Nixed: Federal Court Strikes Down Labor Board's Cemex Ruling

BT
Barnes & Thornburg LLP

Contributor

In a changing marketplace, Barnes & Thornburg stands ready at a moment’s notice, adapting with agility and precision to achieve your goals. As one of the 100 largest law firms in the United States, our 800 legal professionals in 23 offices put their collective experience to work so you can succeed.
Labor law and the labor relations landscape in the United States were upended in 2023 when the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued its ruling in Cemex.
United States Kentucky Employment and HR
David Pryzbylski’s articles from Barnes & Thornburg LLP are most popular:
  • within Employment and HR topic(s)
  • in United States
  • with readers working within the Business & Consumer Services and Construction & Engineering industries
Barnes & Thornburg LLP are most popular:
  • within Litigation and Mediation & Arbitration topic(s)

Labor law and the labor relations landscape in the United States were upended in 2023 when the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued its ruling in Cemex. In that case, the agency set up a framework that drastically altered how unions can attain representative status over a workforce, including by achieving such status through an NLRB order versus winning a secret-ballot election (i.e., a bargaining order).

Last week, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the Cemex framework and invalidated it. According to an article from Bloomberg Law:

"A federal appeals court rejected the NLRB's landmark Biden-era ruling that aimed to discourage employers from violating labor law before union elections."

"The National Labor Relations Board overstepped its authority in 2023's Cemex Construction Materials Pacific LLC, which was a rulemaking disguised as the adjudication of a dispute, a divided U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held Friday in a decision involving a Kentucky bourbon distillery."

In short, the court said the NLRB went too far by overhauling the standard it uses to evaluate the propriety of bargaining orders — a standard that had been in place for five decades plus. The court remanded the case back to the NLRB for further consideration. It will be interesting to see what the agency says about the Cemex standard on remand. The NLRB currently does not have a three-member majority — it only has two members of the same party — and historically it has waited until it has a three-member majority before overruling significant precedent.

Big picture, this ruling only applies within the jurisdiction of the Sixth Circuit (Ohio, Michigan and Kentucky). Unless the NLRB or the U.S. Supreme Court rules otherwise, the Cemex standard will prevail (for now) in other jurisdictions. Stay tuned to see how this all plays out.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More