ARTICLE
12 January 2021

Follow-Up On "Section 409A Meets 162(m) And Some Plans And Agreements May Need To Be Amended"

WT
Winston Taylor

Contributor

Whether you're leading the way, disrupting an industry, entering a new phase of growth, or launching a defining product—we're in the room with you. In the action. Sleeves rolled up.

With a rich history spanning both sides of the Atlantic, we are present in the major commercial centers that matter to our clients: the U.S., the U.K., Europe, Latin America, and the Middle East. Combining scale with the speed clients demand, our defining capabilities include major litigation, critical transactions, strategic IP, and private wealth.

Our team of over 1,400 lawyers works hand-in-hand across markets, sectors, practice areas, and client teams. All-in problem solvers, we bring the creativity to think differently, and the pragmatism to get things done when it counts the most.

Embedded in your business and sharing your ambition, we take the work personally. Shaping what we do and how we do it around your goals and needs, always one step ahead of the moment.

Readers asked a few questions about last week's post on Section 409A Meets 162(m) and Some Deferred Compensation Plans and Agreements May Need to be Amended by December 31
United States Employment and HR
Winston Taylor are most popular:
  • within Media, Telecoms, IT and Entertainment topic(s)

Readers asked a few questions about last week's post on Section 409A Meets 162(m) and Some Deferred Compensation Plans and Agreements May Need to be Amended by December 31. In effect, all of the questions boiled down to one: "But Mike, doesn't this only apply to our non-qualified deferred compensation plans and SERPs?"

The answer is: Language providing for the delay of payments that, if made as scheduled, would not be deductible due to the $1 million deductibility cap of Code Section 162(m) most often appears in SERP and deferred compensation plan documents. However, we (and other firms, presumably) had for some clients drafted this language into employment and equity award agreements and special bonus, severance, and other types of plans and arrangements. We did not add this further deferral language often, but for some clients for which Section 162(m) was a major concern, e.g., where all 5 NEOs where way over the $1 million cap, and under some arrangements under which significant sums might be paid, we did add it.

Therefore, when you review your compensation plans and agreements for this 409A/162(m) trap, please take moment to look beyond the deferred compensation plans and SERPs. 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More