ARTICLE
26 September 2016

CFTC Orders FCM To Pay $1.5 Million Penalty For Supervisory And Risk Management Failures

HL
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Contributor

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes matters.

Operating at the intersection of business, finance, and government, we bring an unwavering commitment to client service and the decisive counsel that helps clients achieve exceptional results.

Consistently recognized for innovation across legal services, we combine sharp judgment with deep commercial perspective and intellectual rigor to address critical, cutting-edge challenges.

With 3,100 lawyers worldwide, we offer global scale with strong local insight in the markets that matter most. Our commitment extends beyond client work through pro bono activities, community investment, and responsible business practices.

The CFTC settled charges against a Futures Commission Merchant ("FCM") and its Chief Executive and Chief Risk Officers.
United States Finance and Banking
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader are most popular:
  • within Intellectual Property, Government, Public Sector, Food, Drugs, Healthcare and Life Sciences topic(s)
  • with readers working within the Consumer Industries industries

The CFTC settled charges against a Futures Commission Merchant ("FCM") and its Chief Executive and Chief Risk Officers for: (i) failing to diligently supervise the handling of certain commodity interest accounts; (ii) having deficient risk management and credit risk practices; and (iii) knowingly making inaccurate statements to the CFTC through the submission of required risk manuals and the Annual Chief Compliance Officer's Report. The CFTC noted that these charges mark its first action enforcing CFTC Rules 1.11 and 1.73, which involve risk management program and supervision obligations for FCMs and clearing FCMs' risk management obligations, respectively.

The Order found that the respondents failed to take adequate supervisory measures after being notified by three exchanges of possible unlawful trading by one of its customers. The Order also found that although the FCM possessed written policies and procedures that appeared to comply with Rule 1.11, it did not, in practice, follow them. Among other things, the CFTC faulted the FCM for failing to place limits on the customer's trading based on prudent risk control measures.

The CFTC required the FCM and two of its executives to pay, jointly and severally, a $1.5 million civil monetary penalty.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More