ARTICLE
24 March 2026

Fifth Circuit Denies The FTC’s Motion For Stay Pending Appeal; HSR Filers May Now File On The Old, Simpler HSR Form

B
BakerHostetler

Contributor

Recognized as one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler is a leading national law firm that helps clients around the world address their most complex and critical business and regulatory issues. With five core national practice groups — Business, Labor and Employment, Intellectual Property, Litigation, and Tax — the firm has more than 970 lawyers located in 14 offices coast to coast. BakerHostetler is widely regarded as having one of the country’s top 10 tax practices, a nationally recognized litigation practice, an award-winning data privacy practice and an industry-leading business practice. The firm is also recognized internationally for its groundbreaking work recovering more than $13 billion in the Madoff Recovery Initiative, representing the SIPA Trustee for the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC. Visit bakerlaw.com
On March 19, 2026, the Fifth Circuit denied the FTC’s motion for a stay pending appeal of a district court order invalidating the new HSR form that has been in effect since February 2025.
United States Antitrust/Competition Law

Key Takeaway

  • Effective immediately, parties may use the old, simpler HSR form for premerger notification to the FTC and the DOJ.

On March 19, 2026, the Fifth Circuit denied the FTC’s motion for a stay pending appeal of a district court order invalidating the new HSR form that has been in effect since February 2025.1 Effective immediately, HSR filers may revert to filing on the old, simpler HSR form to satisfy their premerger notification requirements for transactions subject to the HSR Act.

The invalidated version of the form had imposed more burdensome requirements on filers, such as production of additional categories of documents and narrative responses.2 In February 2026, a district court in Texas invalidated the 2024 FTC final rule that created the new HSR forms, finding that the FTC exceeded its authority under the HSR Act and the Administrative Procedure Act.3

In a March 19 post on its website, the FTC says parties may voluntarily continue to use the new HSR forms,4 but it is unlikely many would choose to do so going forward because the previous version of the form took less time and cost less to prepare for both buyers and sellers.

Footnotes

1. See Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. Federal Trade Commission, Case No. 26-40094 (5th Cir. Mar. 19, 2026), ECF No. 44-2.

2. https://www.bakerlaw.com/insights/ftc-unveils-sweeping-modifications-to-hsr-merger-notification-form/

3. See Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. Federal Trade Commission, Case No. 6:25-cv-9-JDK (E.D. Tex. Feb. 12, 2026), ECF No. 75; see also https://www.bakerlaw.com/insights/federal-court-vacates-and-sets-aside-the-new-hsr-form/.

4. https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/premerger-notification-program

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More