ARTICLE
3 July 2025

Supreme Court Avoids Ruling On The Constitutionality Of Trump's Executive Order On Birthright Citizenship…For Now

KL
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

Contributor

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer is a world-leading global law firm, where our ambition is to help you achieve your goals. Exceptional client service and the pursuit of excellence are at our core. We invest in and care about our client relationships, which is why so many are longstanding. We enjoy breaking new ground, as we have for over 170 years. As a fully integrated transatlantic and transpacific firm, we are where you need us to be. Our footprint is extensive and committed across the world’s largest markets, key financial centres and major growth hubs. At our best tackling complexity and navigating change, we work alongside you on demanding litigation, exacting regulatory work and complex public and private market transactions. We are recognised as leading in these areas. We are immersed in the sectors and challenges that impact you. We are recognised as standing apart in energy, infrastructure and resources. And we’re focused on areas of growth that affect every business across the world.
On June 27, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that federal courts lack the authority to issue a "universal" injunction on President Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship
United Kingdom Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On June 27, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that federal courts lack the authority to issue a "universal" injunction on President Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship. The executive order directs federal agencies to refuse to recognize birthright citizenship for children born in the United States unless at least one parent is a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident (i.e., green card holder). Federal judges in Maryland, Massachusetts, and Washington state had previously enjoined the executive order nationwide. The Supreme Court ruled that federal district court judges cannot impose a nationwide preliminary injunction on the executive order. However, the Supreme Court did not rule on the constitutionality of the order and instead instructed the lower courts to reassess the scope of any limits imposed by subsequent rulings.

The Court also held that the birthright citizenship executive order cannot take effect for at least 30 days from June 27, 2025. This 30-day window will allow for additional legal challenges, which we anticipate to be brought. If the executive order ultimately takes effect, there are a litany of unanswered questions, including the logistics of how a child born to two nonimmigrants (e.g., H-1Bs, L-1s, H-4s, L-2s, etc.) legally in the United States will obtain dependent status.

We will keep you updated on future developments on the birthright citizenship issue.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More