United Kingdom: Class Actions

Subscribe
Litigation law, mediation law, and arbitrage law thought leadership, articles, podcasts, videos and webinars from expert sources across the legal world. Explore insights covering civil law, class actions, dispute resolution, libel and defamation and more in relation to litigation, mediation and arbitration.
Article
A New Consumer Class Action Regime For The UK?
The Law Commission is considering whether the UK should introduce a new opt-out class action regime to make it easier for groups of consumers to bring claims relating to unlawful business practices. This potential reform could significantly change how large-scale consumer claims are handled, particularly where many people have been affected by the same conduct, though questions remain about how to ensure compensation reaches those entitled to it.
United Kingdom Litigation
Bond Turner
Article
Group Litigation Orders: Supreme Court Clarifies When Courts May Order That A Judgment On A GLO Issue Is Not Binding On Other Parties Due To A Subsequent Change In The Law
The Supreme Court has clarified the circumstances in which courts may order that a judgment on a Group Litigation Order (GLO) issue is not binding on other parties when there has been a subsequent change in the law. The decision establishes that such orders should only be made in rare cases where it has been clearly established that the legal basis for the test case decision was wrong...
United Kingdom Litigation
KL
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Article
You Can’t Take Something For Nothing: Court Of Appeal Allows Class Representative To Pursue User Damages In Competition Claims
The Court of Appeal has rejected Meta's challenge to Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen's amendment of her pleadings to include a claim for 'user damages' in a competition law case concerning Facebook's collection of personal data. This decision opens up another potential claim against tech companies for alleged misuse of consumer data, with the question of whether such damages will be awarded to be decided at trial in October 2028.
United Kingdom Anti-trust
M
Macfarlanes LLP
Article
Evolving Risks And Legal Challenges Relating To Online Harm - Reflections From A Global Liability Defence Panel
As online harm evolves from a regulatory concern into a significant liability exposure, platforms face mounting pressure from claimants alleging psychiatric injury, addictive design, and failures to remove harmful content. With regulators in the UK, Australia, and the US placing greater responsibility on digital platforms to identify and mitigate foreseeable harms, organizations must reassess their governance, risk management, and insurance arrangements to address this rapidly developing area of litigation.
United Kingdom Litigation
K
Kennedys
Article
Multi-party Claims: Court Of Appeal Upholds Decision Allowing Over 5,000 Motor Finance Claims To Be Brought Together
The Court of Appeal has upheld a High Court decision allowing over 5,000 motor finance claims to proceed together using omnibus claim forms, despite the fact-specific nature of unfair relationship claims under the Consumer Credit Act. While emphasizing this was a decision on its own facts, the court's analysis of convenience factors and case management approaches offers important guidance for multi-party litigation.
United Kingdom Litigation
KL
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Article
High Court Adjourns Landmark Securities Class Action Trial Due To Risk Of Prejudice To Overlapping Criminal Proceedings
The High Court has adjourned a landmark securities class action trial that was scheduled to begin in October 2026, marking what would have been the first such claim under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 to proceed to trial. The decision highlights the complex interplay between civil and criminal proceedings when substantial overlap exists, as the court weighed the risk of prejudicing ongoing criminal prosecution against the principle of open justice.
United Kingdom Litigation
KL
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Article
Supreme Court Provides Welcome Guidance On Collective Proceedings As CAT And Court Of Appeal At Odds
The UK Supreme Court's decision in Evans v Barclays Bank clarifies critical distinctions between opt-in and opt-out collective proceedings, establishing that claim strength is a relevant factor in certification decisions and that opt-in should be the starting point. The judgment addresses the weight to be given to regulatory decisions, the balance between access to justice and defendants' rights, and the practical considerations that should guide the Competition Appeal Tribunal's certification process.
United Kingdom Anti-trust
AP
Arnold & Porter
Article
Not At All Costs: Competition Appeal Tribunal Refuses CPO In Atlantic Salmon Cartel Collective Proceedings
The Competition Appeal Tribunal has refused to grant a Collective Proceedings Order in a major consumer claim against Atlantic salmon producers, marking the first time certification has been denied solely on cost-benefit grounds. The decision scrutinizes the economics of opt-out collective proceedings and sets new expectations for class representatives to demonstrate realistic pathways to delivering value to class members rather than primarily benefiting lawyers and funders.
United Kingdom Litigation
M
Macfarlanes LLP
See more