ARTICLE
17 July 2026

Kenyan High Court Strikes Down Directive Affecting Intellectual Property Administration

AA
Adams & Adams

Contributor

Adams & AdamsĀ is an internationally recognised and leading African law firm that specialises in providing intellectual property and commercial services.
The Kenyan High Court has delivered a landmark judgment nullifying a controversial directive that would have required KIPI Board approval for intellectual property registrations. This decision addresses fundamental questions about the proper allocation of authority between Kenya's IP governance bodies and the technical functions of trademark and patent administration. The ruling has significant implications for how intellectual property rights are processed and protected in Kenya's legal framework.
Kenya Intellectual Property
Adams & Adams are most popular:
  • within Transport, Technology and Consumer Protection topic(s)

In a landmark judgment delivered on 29 June 2026, the Kenyan High Court has nullified the Ministry of Investments, Trade and Industry’s directive of 30 September 2025, which sought to require Kenya Industrial Property Institute (KIPI) Board approval for the registration, renewal and revocation of trade marks, patents, utility models and industrial designs. This is a significant development which all intellectual property stakeholders in Kenya should take note of, given the effect it has had to safeguard the integrity of the local intellectual property system.

In Law Society of Kenya v. Principal Secretary, State Department for Industry & Others, the Court set aside the directive in its entirety, reaffirming the statutory framework governing the administration of intellectual property rights in Kenya. The Court held that the directive unlawfully attempted to transfer technical and operational responsibilities from the Registrar of Trade Marks and KIPI management to the KIPI Board, whose mandate is limited to governance and oversight functions. The judgment further found that the directive exceeded the Principal Secretary’s powers and would have introduced unnecessary and unlawful administrative hurdles and delays into Kenya’s IP system.

As a result, the established procedures for the filing, examination, registration, renewal and enforcement of intellectual property rights before KIPI remain unchanged. The decision provides much-needed certainty for rights holders and reinforces the independence and integrity of Kenya’s intellectual property administration framework.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More